MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000553375

Медицинская библиотека · Liver cancer · 2026

Lenvatinib versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Older Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subgroup Analysis of the REFLECT Trial.

Kudo Masatoshi, Vogel Arndt, Jeffry Evans Thomas R, Ma Yuk Ting, Daniele Bruno, Baron Ari David, Mahipal Amit, Qin Shukui, Blanc Jean Frederic, Lopez Carlos Lopez, Cheng Ann-Lii, Choo Su Pin, Piscaglia Fabio, Mody Kalgi, Ren Min, Chan Stephen Lam

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In the open-label, phase 3 REFLECT trial, lenvatinib had noninferior overall survival (OS) to sorafenib, as well as improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We report post hoc safety and efficacy in older patients.

METHODS

In REFLECT (NCT01761266), patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed uHCC were randomly assigned 1:1 to lenvatinib (12 mg/day [bodyweight ≥60 kg] or 8 mg/day [bodyweight <60 kg]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. In this analysis, OS, PFS, ORR, and safety were evaluated in patients aged ≥65 and ≥75 years. Efficacy was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors by masked independent imaging review.

RESULTS

By data cutoff (November 13, 2016), 401 patients (208 receiving lenvatinib, 193 receiving sorafenib) were aged ≥65 years; of them, 125 (58 receiving lenvatinib, 67 receiving sorafenib) were aged ≥75 years. In the age ≥65 group, median OS was 14.6 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.7) in the lenvatinib arm and 13.4 months (95% CI: 11.6-16.3) in the sorafenib arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.844; 95% CI: 0.664-1.074); the OS HR was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.634-1.028) after adjusting for baseline alpha-fetoprotein. Median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI: 5.6-9.1) with lenvatinib and 5.4 months (95% CI: 3.6-5.5) with sorafenib (HR: 0.571; 95% CI: 0.432-0.755). ORRs were 42.8% (95% CI: 36.1-49.5) with lenvatinib and 14.5% (95% CI: 9.5-19.5) with sorafenib. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hypertension (47.3%) in the lenvatinib arm and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (50.8%) in the sorafenib arm. The incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs was 82.1% and 72.5% in the lenvatinib and sorafenib arm, respectively. Similar results were observed in patients aged ≥75 years.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the overall REFLECT population, older patients in the lenvatinib arm generally showed improved efficacy versus the sorafenib arm, supporting lenvatinib as an option for older patients with uHCC.

Для цитирования: Kudo Masatoshi, Vogel Arndt, Jeffry Evans Thomas R, Ma Yuk Ting, Daniele Bruno, Baron Ari David, Mahipal Amit, Qin Shukui, Blanc Jean Frederic, Lopez Carlos Lopez, Cheng Ann-Lii, Choo Su Pin, Piscaglia Fabio, Mody Kalgi, Ren Min, Chan Stephen Lam. Lenvatinib versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Older Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subgroup Analysis of the REFLECT Trial.. Liver cancer. 2026. DOI: 10.1159/000553375.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.