Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2020
Antipsychotic Medication in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Literature Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kumar Sanjana, Sudhakar Shwetha, Sajatovic Martha, Levin Jennifer B
Аннотация
PURPOSE: There is limited evidence on the use of antipsychotic medications to treat people with schizophrenia in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This systematic literature review identified original research on use of antipsychotic drugs for primary psychotic disorders in SSA, assessed the methodological quality of studies, summarized intervention strategies, and examined patient-level outcomes.
METHODS: PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane Collaboration, African Journals Online, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies in SSA that focused on antipsychotic treatment for primary psychotic disorders and that investigated at least one patient-level outcome. Articles in English and published before April 2019 were included. Epidemiological studies, drug discontinuation studies, studies with drugs other than antipsychotics, and multicenter studies that did not specify SSA results were excluded. An adapted standardized instrument assessed methodological quality.
RESULTS: Twenty-six articles were reviewed. Three levels of evidence were found: single-group reports, quasi-experimental studies, and randomized controlled trials. Study outcomes included change in psychiatric symptoms, adverse effects, remission rates, or change in functional status. Nine studies reported improvements in psychiatric symptoms with antipsychotic medication. Seven studies investigating adverse effects of antipsychotics found that they were associated with an increase in metabolic syndrome. Two studies reported that remission was achieved in most subjects, and one study reported improvements in functional status.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite adverse effects, treatment with antipsychotic medications may be beneficial for individuals with primary psychotic disorders in SSA. Apart from South Africa, there is a scarcity of research on antipsychotics from countries in SSA, and there are numerous important gaps in the literature.
METHODS: PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane Collaboration, African Journals Online, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies in SSA that focused on antipsychotic treatment for primary psychotic disorders and that investigated at least one patient-level outcome. Articles in English and published before April 2019 were included. Epidemiological studies, drug discontinuation studies, studies with drugs other than antipsychotics, and multicenter studies that did not specify SSA results were excluded. An adapted standardized instrument assessed methodological quality.
RESULTS: Twenty-six articles were reviewed. Three levels of evidence were found: single-group reports, quasi-experimental studies, and randomized controlled trials. Study outcomes included change in psychiatric symptoms, adverse effects, remission rates, or change in functional status. Nine studies reported improvements in psychiatric symptoms with antipsychotic medication. Seven studies investigating adverse effects of antipsychotics found that they were associated with an increase in metabolic syndrome. Two studies reported that remission was achieved in most subjects, and one study reported improvements in functional status.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite adverse effects, treatment with antipsychotic medications may be beneficial for individuals with primary psychotic disorders in SSA. Apart from South Africa, there is a scarcity of research on antipsychotics from countries in SSA, and there are numerous important gaps in the literature.