MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00494755211007002

Медицинская библиотека · Tropical doctor · 2021

Feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations: A prospective observational study.

Shukla Prabhat, Somashekar Uday, Thakur Dileep S, Kothari Reena, Sharma Dhananjaya

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Loop ileostomy is commonly performed for typhoid ileal perforations as temporary faecal diversion. This is associated with several stoma-related complications and also requires further surgery for its closure. Thus, we were prompted to conduct a prospective observational study on the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations. After dealing with the perforation, a ghost ileostomy was performed in 10 selected patients with favourable circumstances; otherwise, a conventional loop ileostomy was performed in 19 patients. The two groups were comparable (p > 0.05) for morbidity and mortality except for stoma-related complications, seen only in the loop ileostomy group. Body weight was better preserved in the ghost ileostomy group. One patient in the ghost ileostomy group required conversion to loop ileostomy owing to signs of intra-peritoneal suture leak, without any detriment to outcome. Our study shows safety, feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in selected patients with typhoid ileal perforations, thus avoiding loop ileostomy in one-third of patients.

Для цитирования: Shukla Prabhat, Somashekar Uday, Thakur Dileep S, Kothari Reena, Sharma Dhananjaya. Feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations: A prospective observational study.. Tropical doctor. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00494755211007002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.