European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
The discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 questionnaire to detect residue and aspiration in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gölaç Hakan, Atalık Güzide, Gülaçtı Adnan, Şansal Ebru, Ceylan Banu Tijen, Esen Aydınlı Fatma, Yılmaz Metin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 (EAT-10) to detect postswallow residue and aspiration for different consistencies.
METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia (42 males and 30 females, mean ± sd age of 60.42 ± 15.82) were included. After completing the EAT-10, Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed to assess the efficiency and safety of swallowing for the following consistencies: thin liquid, nectar thick, yogurt, and solid. While swallowing efficiency was evaluated using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to evaluate swallowing safety.
RESULTS: The EAT-10 questionnaire significantly identified the patients with residue from those without residue for the following consistencies and anatomic locations: thin liquid residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 10, p = 0.009), nectar thick residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.001), yogurt residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.009), yogurt residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 9, p = 0.015), and solid residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 13, p = 0.016). However, the same discriminant ability of EAT-10 was not found for detecting aspiration in any consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The EAT-10 questionnaire can be used as an assessment tool to judge swallowing efficiency in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia, but the same is not evident for swallowing safety.
METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia (42 males and 30 females, mean ± sd age of 60.42 ± 15.82) were included. After completing the EAT-10, Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed to assess the efficiency and safety of swallowing for the following consistencies: thin liquid, nectar thick, yogurt, and solid. While swallowing efficiency was evaluated using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to evaluate swallowing safety.
RESULTS: The EAT-10 questionnaire significantly identified the patients with residue from those without residue for the following consistencies and anatomic locations: thin liquid residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 10, p = 0.009), nectar thick residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.001), yogurt residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.009), yogurt residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 9, p = 0.015), and solid residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 13, p = 0.016). However, the same discriminant ability of EAT-10 was not found for detecting aspiration in any consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The EAT-10 questionnaire can be used as an assessment tool to judge swallowing efficiency in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia, but the same is not evident for swallowing safety.