MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.55894

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Harnessing Neuroplasticity: A Case Report on Physiotherapy Rehabilitation for Millard-Gubler Syndrome.

Patil Anushri R, Samal Snehal, Sasun Anam R

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This case report glances at the physiotherapy management and motor recovery outcomes of a 47-year-old female who had a pontine infarction complicated by Millard-Gubler syndrome. Pontine infarction is a stroke that occurs in the pons region of the brainstem, resulting in impaired blood flow and subsequent tissue damage. Millard-Gubler syndrome, a rare form of pontine infarction, is distinguished by ipsilateral abducens (sixth cranial nerve) and facial (seventh cranial nerve) nerve palsy, which cause horizontal gaze palsy and facial weakness, respectively. Other common symptoms include contralateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia, dysarthria, and hypertonia. In this case, the patient had nystagmus, dysarthria, hypertonia, decreased consciousness, and limited mobility. Physiotherapy interventions were used in a multidisciplinary approach to address these deficits, with a focus on improving gaze stability, reducing hypertonia, facilitating bed mobility, and improving respiratory function. The outcomes were evaluated using standardised measures such as the Brunnstrom staging for motor recovery, the Modified Ashworth Scale for hypertonia, and the Functional Independence Measure for functional status. This case demonstrates the critical role of physiotherapy in improving motor recovery and functional outcomes.

Для цитирования: Patil Anushri R, Samal Snehal, Sasun Anam R. Harnessing Neuroplasticity: A Case Report on Physiotherapy Rehabilitation for Millard-Gubler Syndrome.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55894.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.