DOI 10.1097/js9.0000000000002556
Efficacy and safety of minor salivary gland transplantation for the treatment of severe dry eye disease: a single-arm meta-analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have demonstrated that minor salivary gland transplantation (MSGT) is an effective treatment for severe dry eye disease (DED). However, almost all studies on this procedure have been non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, different first-line treatments, and uncontrolled statistical analysis, which may result in a lack of effective metrics to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LSGT. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MSGT in patients with severe DED.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Outcomes, including symptomatic improvement, changes in the Schirmer test (ST) value, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining (CS) value, and adverse events (AEs), were extracted for further analysis. Proportional analysis was used for binary data, and the mean difference was used for continuous data. All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were included.
RESULTS
Eight studies involving 150 patients (158 eyes) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The symptoms of DED improved in 73.6% of patients. Regarding signs, the pooled ST values improved by an average of 3.684 mm, TBUT increased by 1.823 seconds, and CS decreased by 1.966. The most common treatment-related AEs to MSGT were hypesthesia of the lip (10%), cosmetic problems (3%), and epiphora (2%).
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, this meta-analysis demonstrated that MSGT can potentially treat severe DED without severe AEs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.