Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2004
[Periocular dermatitis].
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dirschka Thomas, Tronnier Hagen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Perioral dermatitis paradoxically sometimes spares the entire perioral region. There may be isolated periocular involvement (periocular dermatitis).
PATIENTS/METHODS: The records of 23 patients with only periocular dermatitis were reviewed with respect to the following parameters: clinical findings, history of atopy, topical facial treatment, prick and patch tests, CAP-SX1, previous treatment, time to healing and relapses. 23 patients with no history of periocular dermatitis were matched for age and sex (case-control study).
RESULTS: The predominant clinical finding in the affected group was micropapules primarily in the lateral corner of the eye and lower eyelid. The groups differed significantly (p < 0.05) with regard to the history of atopic diseases and reactive prick tests. 22 patients regularly used face-care or eye-care products. These patients did not differ significantly from the control group with regard to frequency and type of product used. 6 patients had been previously treated with topical corticosteroids. The time to healing was 2-8 weeks (median: 4 weeks).
CONCLUSIONS: Periocular dermatitis is a variation on perioral dermatitis, where-by similar pathogenetic factors are observed. The elimination of topical corticosteroids and the gradual reduction of skin-care products regularly lead to clearing of the condition.
PATIENTS/METHODS: The records of 23 patients with only periocular dermatitis were reviewed with respect to the following parameters: clinical findings, history of atopy, topical facial treatment, prick and patch tests, CAP-SX1, previous treatment, time to healing and relapses. 23 patients with no history of periocular dermatitis were matched for age and sex (case-control study).
RESULTS: The predominant clinical finding in the affected group was micropapules primarily in the lateral corner of the eye and lower eyelid. The groups differed significantly (p < 0.05) with regard to the history of atopic diseases and reactive prick tests. 22 patients regularly used face-care or eye-care products. These patients did not differ significantly from the control group with regard to frequency and type of product used. 6 patients had been previously treated with topical corticosteroids. The time to healing was 2-8 weeks (median: 4 weeks).
CONCLUSIONS: Periocular dermatitis is a variation on perioral dermatitis, where-by similar pathogenetic factors are observed. The elimination of topical corticosteroids and the gradual reduction of skin-care products regularly lead to clearing of the condition.