MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12903-026-09638-z

Медицинская библиотека · BMC oral health · 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT and teledentistry compared with dentist examination in detecting dental caries: preliminary diagnostic accuracy study.

Karawia Inas, Mahmoud Aya, Ali Rewan, Kamal Marie, Gaber Aya, Hall Mohamed Ashraf

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Dental caries is a common oral health problem globally, necessitating accurate and accessible diagnostic approaches. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT (AI-based assessment) and teledentistry with the clinical dental examination as the clinical reference standard for detecting dental caries.

METHODOLOGY: A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on a sample of 40 tooth images, determined through power analysis. Standardized smartphone images were obtained and assessed independently using two approaches: ChatGPT-based analysis and teledentistry evaluation by dental professionals. The findings from both methods were compared to clinical examination results. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC). Agreement with the clinical reference standard was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient, while the McNemar test was used to assess systematic differences between paired classifications.

RESULTS

Teledentistry showed numerically higher diagnostic performance than ChatGPT across all evaluated parameters. It achieved higher sensitivity (89.5% vs. 78.9%), specificity (85.7% vs. 66.7%), PPV (85% vs. 68.2%), NPV (90% vs. 77.8%), and overall accuracy (87.5% vs. 72.5%). Additionally, teledentistry showed a higher AUC (0.876) compared to ChatGPT (0.728), suggesting better discriminative ability. Both methods showed no statistically significant differences from the clinical reference standard; however, ChatGPT exhibited greater inconsistency.

CONCLUSION

Teledentistry demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy and agreement with the clinical reference standard than ChatGPT in this preliminary study and may serve as a reliable diagnostic adjunct, particularly in remote settings. However, further refinement and validation of AI-based tools such as ChatGPT are necessary to improve diagnostic performance, with future research focusing on optimizing image quality and expanding datasets to enhance AI reliability.

Для цитирования: Karawia Inas, Mahmoud Aya, Ali Rewan, Kamal Marie, Gaber Aya, Hall Mohamed Ashraf. Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT and teledentistry compared with dentist examination in detecting dental caries: preliminary diagnostic accuracy study.. BMC oral health. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-026-09638-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.