Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
Surgical and Clinical Aspects Associated with Double-Valve Infective Endocarditis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lerta Sonia, Sangaletti Gloria, Villano Vincenzo Antonio, Puci Flavia, Kushta Eraldo, Totaro Pasquale, Amoroso Filippo, Magrini Giulia, Valsecchi Pietro, Bruno Raffaele, Seminari Elena
Аннотация
Background: Double-valve infective endocarditis (DVIE) accounts for 15-20% of all endocarditis and represents a challenge due to the increased incidence of embolic events and congestive heart failure compared to infective endocarditis (IE) affecting one valve. This study aims to evaluate patients' characteristics, surgical procedures, complications, and mortality associated with DVIE in our tertiary hospital in Italy. The Endocarditis Registry STEADY includes patients admitted with IE from January 2009 to March 2024 (n = 398). Sixty-three of them (16%) had DVIE. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study, analyzing demographic, clinical, and microbiological data in DVIE patients, comparing those treated surgically (surgical group, SG) with those treated medically (non-surgical group, NSG). Results: The groups were homogeneous in age, microbiological yields, type of valve involved, and risk factors for infective endocarditis. The surgical group presented significantly more cancer history, intracardiac complications, and new-onset arrhythmias compared to the non-surgical group. Median hospital stay was similar in both groups. In SG, the most common postoperative complication was new rhythm disorders; other complications such as cardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion, and pneumothorax were rare. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups; however, one-year survival was higher in the surgical group (72% vs. 54%, p = 0.031). In our series, 16 patients were over 75 years old (25%), and 7 of them (44%) underwent cardiac surgery. One-year survival in the surgical group was also higher in this subgroup. Conclusions: Surgical treatment, when indicated, may improve the prognosis of patients with DVIE, including elderly patients.