MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02212.x

Медицинская библиотека · Acta ophthalmologica · 2011

Glaucoma costs in Denmark in treatment naive patients.

Olsen Jens, Berdeaux Gilles, Skov Jesper

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the costs and providers of glaucoma treatment in Denmark.

METHODS

Analyses were based on National Register data. Glaucoma/OHT patients were identified by their first prescription for glaucoma medication (ATC-codes) in the Danish Register of Medicinal Product Statistics 2002-2007. Patients had used no glaucoma medication for 6 months. Data for 2007 were sampled cross-sectionally for a budgetary analysis of glaucoma (ICD10 code) medication and services consumed in the primary and secondary health care services. Patients were categorized according to their number of treatment changes.

RESULTS

The Danish annual incidence rate of glaucoma was estimated at 1.2 per 1000 adult persons. Thirty-seven per cent of patients (men 44%, mean age 68 years; women 56%, mean age 71 years) persisted with their initial treatment regimen, 21% had changed to a second regimen, and 43% had experienced ≥ 3 regimens. Treatment costs increased with the number of sequential regimens. Annual glaucoma costs (health care sector perspective) were €305 for patients under their initial regimen, increasing to €740 with ≥ 3 regimens. Drug costs accounted for 57% of total cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs represented the major cost of glaucoma, and those costs increased, obviously, with the number of treatment changes.

Для цитирования: Olsen Jens, Berdeaux Gilles, Skov Jesper. Glaucoma costs in Denmark in treatment naive patients.. Acta ophthalmologica. 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02212.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.