MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.04.001

Медицинская библиотека · Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2016

Early intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures in patients with severe thoracic trauma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Liu Xiao-Yuan, Jiang Meng, Yi C-L, Bai Xiang-Jun, Hak David-J

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Early intramedullary nailing (IMN) within the first 24 h for multiply injured patients with femoral fracture and concomitant thoracic trauma is controversial. Previously published studies have been limited in size and their outcomes have been inconclusive. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the available data in order to guide care and help improve the outcomes for these patients.

METHODS

We searched the literature up to December 2011 in the main medical search engines and identified 6 retrospective cohort studies that explored the safety of early IMN in patients with both femoral fracture and chest injury. Our primary outcome was the rates of pulmonary complication (pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, fat embolism syndrome), multiple organ failure (MOF) and mortality.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant difference in the rate of pulmonary complications, MOF or mortality in the patients treated with early IMN.

CONCLUSION

Early IMN for femoral fractures does not increase the mortality and morbidity in chest- injured patients in the studies analyzed.

Для цитирования: Liu Xiao-Yuan, Jiang Meng, Yi C-L, Bai Xiang-Jun, Hak David-J. Early intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures in patients with severe thoracic trauma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.. Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.04.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.