Radiology advances · 2026
Let distortion-guided restoration: a physics-informed learning framework to correct prostate diffusion MRI artifacts.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Long Ziyang, Binesh Nader, Wang Lixia, Malaji Archana Vadiraj, Yang Chia-Chi, Sun Haoran, Saouaf Rola, Daskivich Timothy, Kim Hyung, Xie Yibin, Li Debiao, Yang Hsin-Jung
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Susceptibility-induced distortion in single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can degrade lesion conspicuity, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation, and confidence in prostate MRI interpretation. Conventional correction strategies typically require additional acquisitions and may be limited in severe artifact settings.
PURPOSE: To develop a physics-informed deep learning framework, distortion-guided restoration (DGR), for acquisition-free correction of ssEPI distortions in prostate DWI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distortion-guided restoration was proposed to learn the inverse of a physically simulated ssEPI distortion process. Clinical prostate DWI and T2-weighted (T2W) images from 408 3T MR examinations originating from 2 clinical datasets, acquired on Siemens 3T MAGNETOM Vida and Biograph mMR scanners, were used for paired distorted/undistorted training data across low-b DWI (b = 50 s/mm2), and scanner-provided ADC maps. The restoration network integrates a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based geometric correction module with a conditional diffusion refinement module, both guided by co-registered T2W images. Model selection and benchmarking were performed on a held-out synthetic test set (n = 34), against conventional algorithms using correction field mapping (FSL FUGUE and TOPUP). Model performance was evaluated in a retrospective study on 34 clinical scans with severe susceptibility artifacts drawn from the same clinical datasets, using quantitative image metrics and blinded radiologist scoring.
RESULTS: On synthetic data, the proposed DGR model achieved the highest peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and lowest normalized mean squared error (NMSE) across low-b DWI (0.089; 95% CI, 0.072-0.105) and ADC maps (0.062; 95% CI, 0.053-0.072), outperforming FSL TOPUP and FUGUE (all P < .001). In the 34 clinical cases affected by susceptibility artifacts, including 16 cases with histologically confirmed lesions (16/34, 47.1%), DGR substantially improved geometric fidelity (2.74 to 3.29), identified all histologically confirmed lesions (16/16, 100%), and enhanced overall image quality and diagnostic confidence (all P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study suggests that a physics-informed hybrid CNN-diffusion framework offers a practical and acquisition-free solution for correcting severe prostate DWI distortions. It warrants further development for clinical utility and implementation.
PURPOSE: To develop a physics-informed deep learning framework, distortion-guided restoration (DGR), for acquisition-free correction of ssEPI distortions in prostate DWI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distortion-guided restoration was proposed to learn the inverse of a physically simulated ssEPI distortion process. Clinical prostate DWI and T2-weighted (T2W) images from 408 3T MR examinations originating from 2 clinical datasets, acquired on Siemens 3T MAGNETOM Vida and Biograph mMR scanners, were used for paired distorted/undistorted training data across low-b DWI (b = 50 s/mm2), and scanner-provided ADC maps. The restoration network integrates a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based geometric correction module with a conditional diffusion refinement module, both guided by co-registered T2W images. Model selection and benchmarking were performed on a held-out synthetic test set (n = 34), against conventional algorithms using correction field mapping (FSL FUGUE and TOPUP). Model performance was evaluated in a retrospective study on 34 clinical scans with severe susceptibility artifacts drawn from the same clinical datasets, using quantitative image metrics and blinded radiologist scoring.
RESULTS: On synthetic data, the proposed DGR model achieved the highest peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and lowest normalized mean squared error (NMSE) across low-b DWI (0.089; 95% CI, 0.072-0.105) and ADC maps (0.062; 95% CI, 0.053-0.072), outperforming FSL TOPUP and FUGUE (all P < .001). In the 34 clinical cases affected by susceptibility artifacts, including 16 cases with histologically confirmed lesions (16/34, 47.1%), DGR substantially improved geometric fidelity (2.74 to 3.29), identified all histologically confirmed lesions (16/16, 100%), and enhanced overall image quality and diagnostic confidence (all P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study suggests that a physics-informed hybrid CNN-diffusion framework offers a practical and acquisition-free solution for correcting severe prostate DWI distortions. It warrants further development for clinical utility and implementation.