MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102286

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025

Redo rates and outcomes of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy vs pyloroplasty for gastroparesis: a retrospective analysis.

Konidala Chamanthi, Dabbs Cameron, Shargo Ryan, Poonen-Honig Isaac, Peddi Pavani, Thélin Camille, Docimo Salvatore, Klam Rebecca, Sujka Joseph

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorder that is defined by objectively delayed gastric emptying of solids in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Gastroparesis presents as a syndrome marked by a range of upper GI symptoms, most commonly nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, belching, and upper abdominal discomfort or pain. Pylorus-targeting approaches have been a common management for gastroparesis, with gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) and pyloroplasty being effective surgical options. However, comparative data on redo procedure rates and outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to compare the frequency, timing, and clinical outcomes of redo interventions after G-POEM vs pyloroplasty in patients with refractory gastroparesis, addressing the current gap in comparative data to help guide long-term procedural decision-making.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent G-POEM or pyloroplasty from 2019 to 2024. Data included redo rates, time to reintervention, and postintervention outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests for categorical and continuous variables.

RESULTS

Among 173 patients (85 who underwent G-POEM and 88 who underwent pyloroplasty), those who underwent pyloroplasty were more likely to have preoperative patient-reported esophageal reflux (P <.001) and concurrent procedures (P <.001). Of note, 42 patients (24%) required redo procedures (G-POEM: 52.4%; pyloroplasty: 47.6%). The mean time to redo was 383.18 days (P =.156). Although the reintervention rates were similar (P =.770), patients who underwent G-POEM more often underwent secondary pyloroplasty, whereas those who underwent pyloroplasty more frequently received gastric neurostimulators (P =.012). Symptom improvement was comparable (P =.870), with 51% reporting relief and 21% achieving resolution.

CONCLUSION

G-POEM and pyloroplasty have similar redo rates but differ in terms of the types of secondary intervention, highlighting the need for individualized treatment planning.

Для цитирования: Konidala Chamanthi, Dabbs Cameron, Shargo Ryan, Poonen-Honig Isaac, Peddi Pavani, Thélin Camille, Docimo Salvatore, Klam Rebecca, Sujka Joseph. Redo rates and outcomes of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy vs pyloroplasty for gastroparesis: a retrospective analysis.. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102286.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.