Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2015
[Concurrent Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) with Septorhinoplasty - Indication, Risks and Chances].
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koch T, Lenarz T, Stolle S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with a chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and a concurrent deformity of the outer nose often require a septorhinoplasty (SRP) for functional or aesthetic reasons, combined with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Aim of this study was to rule out the benefit of this combined approach.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 55 patients (30 m, 25 f, age 16-77 years) with a chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyps combined with a deformity of the outer nose we performed a FESS together with a SRP using a closed or open approach. The control group included 55 patients (18 m, 37 w, age 18-62 years) with SRP alone. All patients got the same type of anestesia and an antibiotic prophylaxis with clindamycin. We compared the rates of inflammation and other complications of surgery.
RESULTS: The only difference between study group and control group was the period of time for surgery. There was neither a relevant inflammation in both groups nor any other significant complication (bleeding, edema, etc). Also the rate of minor revisions after SRP was almost the same in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined FESS and SRP is a safe and effective method without an increased risk of complications compared with SRP alone.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 55 patients (30 m, 25 f, age 16-77 years) with a chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyps combined with a deformity of the outer nose we performed a FESS together with a SRP using a closed or open approach. The control group included 55 patients (18 m, 37 w, age 18-62 years) with SRP alone. All patients got the same type of anestesia and an antibiotic prophylaxis with clindamycin. We compared the rates of inflammation and other complications of surgery.
RESULTS: The only difference between study group and control group was the period of time for surgery. There was neither a relevant inflammation in both groups nor any other significant complication (bleeding, edema, etc). Also the rate of minor revisions after SRP was almost the same in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined FESS and SRP is a safe and effective method without an increased risk of complications compared with SRP alone.