Current pain and headache reports · 2026
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Is Effective in the Management of Trigeminal Pain: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yue Kan, Lei Xinyu, He Ruilin, Jiang Zongbin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) patients usually experience severe facial pain, leading to a significant reduction in quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) on pain relief in patients with TN.
METHODS: The databases of EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE, and PUBMED were searched from inception to 2024 for clinical trials of PNS for TN. The inclusion criteria consisted of any study using PNS to treat TN and reporting outcomes of pain intensity. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Methodological Index of Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool. Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and publication bias was evaluated via Egger's test through STATA17.
RESULTS: We identified 1,574 citations, and included 9 trials comprising 112 participants. In terms of efficacy, PNS was associated with significant pain relief compared to baseline (MD, -6.23 cm [95% CI, -7.20 to -5.26 cm], P < 0.05, I2 = 89%), with the reduction closely approaching the minimal important difference (MID) threshold of 6.25 cm. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with baseline pain scores ≥ 8 experienced greater pain relief (N = 52, MD, -7.06 cm [95% CI, -8.30 to -5.82 cm], I2 = 87%, p = 0.02) compared to patients with pain scores < 8(N = 60, MD, -4.75 cm [95% CI, -6.22 to -3.28 cm], I2 = 89%) .
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis results showed PNS leads to a statistically and clinically significant improvement in pain. PNS may be a promising approach in the management of TN.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) on pain relief in patients with TN.
METHODS: The databases of EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE, and PUBMED were searched from inception to 2024 for clinical trials of PNS for TN. The inclusion criteria consisted of any study using PNS to treat TN and reporting outcomes of pain intensity. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Methodological Index of Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool. Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and publication bias was evaluated via Egger's test through STATA17.
RESULTS: We identified 1,574 citations, and included 9 trials comprising 112 participants. In terms of efficacy, PNS was associated with significant pain relief compared to baseline (MD, -6.23 cm [95% CI, -7.20 to -5.26 cm], P < 0.05, I2 = 89%), with the reduction closely approaching the minimal important difference (MID) threshold of 6.25 cm. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with baseline pain scores ≥ 8 experienced greater pain relief (N = 52, MD, -7.06 cm [95% CI, -8.30 to -5.82 cm], I2 = 87%, p = 0.02) compared to patients with pain scores < 8(N = 60, MD, -4.75 cm [95% CI, -6.22 to -3.28 cm], I2 = 89%) .
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis results showed PNS leads to a statistically and clinically significant improvement in pain. PNS may be a promising approach in the management of TN.