DOI 10.1097/iae.0000000000003962
PRESENTATIONS AND FACTORS AFFECTING OUTCOME OF RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT WITH CHOROIDAL DETACHMENT: An Indo-Taiwanese Study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report the clinical settings, management, and factors associated with outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with concurrent choroidal detachment.
METHODS
Retrospective, consecutive, multicenter case series from January 2014 to January 2021 were included. Cases were from a tertiary eye care center in India and Taiwan.
RESULTS
Overall 303 eyes were included. Mean age was 43.72 ± 20.64 years (median 46). Best-corrected presenting visual acuity was 1.79 ± 0.92 logMAR (median 2.10) (Snellen 20/1,233). Forty-four patients (17.91%) received preoperative steroids. Final visual acuity was 1.33 ± 0.94 logMAR (median 1.10) (Snellen 20/427). Favorable anatomic outcome was seen in 200/303 (66%), whereas favorable functional outcome was seen in 128/303 (42.20%). Factors predicting favorable anatomic outcome were absence of phakic lens status (odds ratio [OR] 2.76), absence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy worse than Grade A (OR 7.69), use of preoperative steroids (OR 4.50), and use of an encircling band (3.85). Factors predicting favorable functional outcome were better presenting visual acuity (OR 3.03), absence of phakic lens status (OR 4.93), absence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy worse than Grade A (OR 10.41), and use of preoperative steroids (OR 7.24).
CONCLUSION
Administration of preoperative steroids, use of an encircling band during surgery, and pseudophakic status of the eye were found to have better outcomes in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with concurrent choroidal detachment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.