Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany) · 2026
Postoperative Delirium: A Survey of Perceptions Among Surgical Providers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berian Julia R, Zarzaur Ben L, Mohanty Sanjay, Kaiksow Farah A, Golden Blair P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) remains a significant, costly complication. Despite increasing awareness in medical specialties, understanding among surgical providers remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) understand surgical providers' self-perceived knowledge of and confidence in identifying and managing POD, and (2) define the perceived importance of POD among surgical providers, relative to other complications.
METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to surgical providers across three hospitals in an academic medical system.
RESULTS: Seventy-six of 267 (28.5%) responded. The majority were somewhat (n=48, 63%) or very confident (n=12, 16%) identifying POD, however, few used validated tools (n=18, 24%). Most were somewhat (n=40, 52.6%) or very confident (n=9, 11.8%) managing POD. Few consulted geriatrics or other fields for co-management (n=23, 30.2%). Among six common complications, delirium consistently ranked third or fourth in importance.
CONCLUSIONS: Future work should focus on increasing the use of validated tools and building interdisciplinary initiatives for co-management.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) understand surgical providers' self-perceived knowledge of and confidence in identifying and managing POD, and (2) define the perceived importance of POD among surgical providers, relative to other complications.
METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to surgical providers across three hospitals in an academic medical system.
RESULTS: Seventy-six of 267 (28.5%) responded. The majority were somewhat (n=48, 63%) or very confident (n=12, 16%) identifying POD, however, few used validated tools (n=18, 24%). Most were somewhat (n=40, 52.6%) or very confident (n=9, 11.8%) managing POD. Few consulted geriatrics or other fields for co-management (n=23, 30.2%). Among six common complications, delirium consistently ranked third or fourth in importance.
CONCLUSIONS: Future work should focus on increasing the use of validated tools and building interdisciplinary initiatives for co-management.