Ophthalmology · 2011
Discrepancies in the concordance of self-reported vision status and visual acuity in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Gasim Mahmood, Munoz Beatriz, West Sheila K, Scott Adrienne W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the association between self-rated vision and distance visual acuity by race and other factors.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis within a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Two thousand five hundred twenty individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, including 666 black participants and 1854 white participants.
METHODS: All participants reported their self-rated vision score. Binocular distance visual acuity was assessed. Based on the level of visual acuity and the self-reported vision score, participants were placed into concordant and discrepant groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the characteristics associated with concordant and discrepant groups.
RESULTS: Black participants were more likely to be represented in the discordant group that reported good vision but had acuity worse than 20/40. In the multivariate analysis, a per-year decrement in years of education received increased the odds of being in both discrepant groups, one that reported good vision but had a visual acuity worse than 20/40 (odds ratio, 1.21; P<0.0001) and the other discrepant group that reported bad vision but had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (odds ratio, 1.04; P<0.0001). A per-year decrement in years of education received also seemed to explain the excess risk of black race in the discrepant group that reported good vision but had a visual acuity worse than 20/40.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the socioeconomically driven discrepancies in self-reported vision status, self-reported vision status should be used cautiously in surveillance surveys, especially when assessing vision inequalities between socioeconomic groups.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis within a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Two thousand five hundred twenty individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, including 666 black participants and 1854 white participants.
METHODS: All participants reported their self-rated vision score. Binocular distance visual acuity was assessed. Based on the level of visual acuity and the self-reported vision score, participants were placed into concordant and discrepant groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the characteristics associated with concordant and discrepant groups.
RESULTS: Black participants were more likely to be represented in the discordant group that reported good vision but had acuity worse than 20/40. In the multivariate analysis, a per-year decrement in years of education received increased the odds of being in both discrepant groups, one that reported good vision but had a visual acuity worse than 20/40 (odds ratio, 1.21; P<0.0001) and the other discrepant group that reported bad vision but had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (odds ratio, 1.04; P<0.0001). A per-year decrement in years of education received also seemed to explain the excess risk of black race in the discrepant group that reported good vision but had a visual acuity worse than 20/40.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the socioeconomically driven discrepancies in self-reported vision status, self-reported vision status should be used cautiously in surveillance surveys, especially when assessing vision inequalities between socioeconomic groups.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Activities of Daily LivingBlack or African AmericanAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationEducational StatusFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMarylandSocial ClassVision DisordersVision TestsVision, BinocularVisual AcuityWhite People