DOI 10.1186/s12909-026-08791-x
Comparison of industrial- and medical-grade silicone phantoms for surgical laser training in dental students.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study explored the potential of industrial- and medical-grade silicone phantoms as alternatives to animal models for surgical laser training in dental students.
METHODS
Tongue molds with exophytic lesions were created using 3D-printed polylactic acid molds. Industrial-grade and medical-grade silicone were injected into the molds to create two distinct educational models. Forty-five sixth-year dental students participated in the study. Students first practiced with an 810-nm diode laser on a sheep tongue and then resected the lesions on the silicone models. Afterwards, they completed a questionnaire evaluating the effectiveness of silicone phantoms in surgical laser training. Data were analyzed using Kendall’s Tau and paired samples t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference between the silicone models in terms of design and construction (P = 0.195), learners’ experience of lesion removal (P = 0.790), or effectiveness in teaching laser courses (P = 0.083). However, the medical-grade silicone was significantly more similar to animal tissues in texture (P < 0.001). Furthermore, working with the diode laser on the medical silicone phantom better simulated working on animal specimens compared to the industrial silicone phantom (P = 0.007). The overall score of the questionnaire was also in favor of medical-grade silicone (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS
Both industrial- and medical-grade silicone phantoms were effective for training dental students in surgical laser applications. However, the medical-grade silicone provided a more realistic training experience and was closer in texture to animal tissue, making it a superior training model for dental students.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.