Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry · 2026
Psychology Consultation Services in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
LaGrotte Caitlin A, Sayde George E, Ho Sheau-Yan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients and their family members experience profound psychologic stress and are at elevated risk for persistent psychiatric sequelae. Despite this, the role of embedded clinical psychologists in the medical intensive care unit remains understudied.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize consultation patterns and service utilization of dedicated psychology services across 2 medical intensive care units and inform future outcomes-focused research.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study describes 2 models of an embedded clinical psychology service within a medical intensive care unit. Psychology consultation data were collected at 2 large, urban academic medical centers over a 1-year period (July 2022-June 2023; N = 428). Descriptive statistics and chi-square and independent t-tests were used to characterize and compare sociodemographic, clinical, and consultation variables across sites.
RESULTS: Family support was the most common reason for psychology consultation across both sites (Cooper University Health Care: 40%, Columbia University Irving Medical Center: 28%). Among patient referrals, anxiety, depression, adjustment difficulties, and coping were most frequent. Trauma/stressor-related, depressive, and anxiety disorders were the most common diagnoses; approximately one-third of patients at each site did not receive a formal psychiatric diagnosis. Columbia University Irving Medical Center patients had significantly longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay and higher rates of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. Rates of mortality (∼40-43%) and comfort care transitions (∼25-26%) among referred patients were notably elevated at both sites. Other similarities and differences of key sociodemographic, psychologic, and medical variables across the 2 sites are presented and discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: Embedded psychologic services were highly utilized for patient and family support in the medical intensive care unit, particularly in the context of communication barriers, end-of-life care, and high medical complexity. Notably, a substantial proportion of patients who did not meet formal psychiatric diagnostic criteria still presented with clinically significant distress amenable to psychologic intervention-a finding with important implications for how psychology services are justified and resourced in critical care settings. Future research should examine associations between embedded psychology consultation and intensive care unit outcomes, including length of stay, delirium incidence and duration, post-intensive care unit psychiatric distress, and family member wellbeing.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize consultation patterns and service utilization of dedicated psychology services across 2 medical intensive care units and inform future outcomes-focused research.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study describes 2 models of an embedded clinical psychology service within a medical intensive care unit. Psychology consultation data were collected at 2 large, urban academic medical centers over a 1-year period (July 2022-June 2023; N = 428). Descriptive statistics and chi-square and independent t-tests were used to characterize and compare sociodemographic, clinical, and consultation variables across sites.
RESULTS: Family support was the most common reason for psychology consultation across both sites (Cooper University Health Care: 40%, Columbia University Irving Medical Center: 28%). Among patient referrals, anxiety, depression, adjustment difficulties, and coping were most frequent. Trauma/stressor-related, depressive, and anxiety disorders were the most common diagnoses; approximately one-third of patients at each site did not receive a formal psychiatric diagnosis. Columbia University Irving Medical Center patients had significantly longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay and higher rates of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. Rates of mortality (∼40-43%) and comfort care transitions (∼25-26%) among referred patients were notably elevated at both sites. Other similarities and differences of key sociodemographic, psychologic, and medical variables across the 2 sites are presented and discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: Embedded psychologic services were highly utilized for patient and family support in the medical intensive care unit, particularly in the context of communication barriers, end-of-life care, and high medical complexity. Notably, a substantial proportion of patients who did not meet formal psychiatric diagnostic criteria still presented with clinically significant distress amenable to psychologic intervention-a finding with important implications for how psychology services are justified and resourced in critical care settings. Future research should examine associations between embedded psychology consultation and intensive care unit outcomes, including length of stay, delirium incidence and duration, post-intensive care unit psychiatric distress, and family member wellbeing.