British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
Pharmacokinetic modelling of intravenous immunoglobulin in children with primary immunodeficiencies and secondary antibody deficiencies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cheng Iek Leng, Huang Zhong Hui, Worth Austen, Booth Claire, Standing Joseph F
Аннотация
AIMS: Children with primary immunodeficiency (PID) and secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) often require immunoglobulin replacement therapy due to low plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and recurrent infections. Existing pharmacokinetic models for immunoglobulin in PID patients predominantly focus on adults, with limited attention to secondary antibody deficiencies and a lesser emphasis on paediatric populations. This study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of IgG in paediatric patients with PID and SAD.
METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic analysis for PID and SAD children treated with intravenous immunoglobulin at a tertiary paediatric centre was conducted using NONMEM® (7.5.1). Dosing simulations to achieve therapeutic levels of 6 and 8 gL-1 were performed.
RESULTS: A population pharmacokinetic analysis of 64 patients (median age 4.08 years, range 0.06-16.8) was performed. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination, incorporating both additive and proportional residual error, adequately described the data. Interindividual variability was modelled on clearance, volume of distribution and baseline IgG levels, with allometric scaling to a 70-kg body weight applied a priori. The estimated clearance was 0.308 L-1 day-1 70 kg-1 (95% CI 0.23, 0.67), and the volume of distribution was 10.96 L-1 70 kg-1 (95% CI 5.97, 15.79). Patients with SAD exhibited a lower clearance rate of 54% compared with PID patients. Dosing simulations indicated that the recommended SAD dosing regimen maintained therapeutic IgG levels in the simulated population. However, only 44.8% to 51.9% of patients with PID achieved target IgG levels with the standard regimen.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into immunoglobulin pharmacokinetics in paediatric PID and SAD patients, guiding optimised dosing strategies. Administering a loading dose would improve the probability of maintaining therapeutic IgG levels during the 4-week dosing interval.
METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic analysis for PID and SAD children treated with intravenous immunoglobulin at a tertiary paediatric centre was conducted using NONMEM® (7.5.1). Dosing simulations to achieve therapeutic levels of 6 and 8 gL-1 were performed.
RESULTS: A population pharmacokinetic analysis of 64 patients (median age 4.08 years, range 0.06-16.8) was performed. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination, incorporating both additive and proportional residual error, adequately described the data. Interindividual variability was modelled on clearance, volume of distribution and baseline IgG levels, with allometric scaling to a 70-kg body weight applied a priori. The estimated clearance was 0.308 L-1 day-1 70 kg-1 (95% CI 0.23, 0.67), and the volume of distribution was 10.96 L-1 70 kg-1 (95% CI 5.97, 15.79). Patients with SAD exhibited a lower clearance rate of 54% compared with PID patients. Dosing simulations indicated that the recommended SAD dosing regimen maintained therapeutic IgG levels in the simulated population. However, only 44.8% to 51.9% of patients with PID achieved target IgG levels with the standard regimen.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into immunoglobulin pharmacokinetics in paediatric PID and SAD patients, guiding optimised dosing strategies. Administering a loading dose would improve the probability of maintaining therapeutic IgG levels during the 4-week dosing interval.