Pediatric radiology · 2025
Highly accelerated 4D flow MRI with respiratory compensation and cardiac view sharing: a cross-sectional study of flow in the great vessels of pediatric congenital heart disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rastegar Jooybari Fatemeh, Huynh Christopher, Portnoy Sharon, Voutsas Jonathan, Balmer-Minnes Diana, Saprungruang Ankavipar, Yoo Shi-Joon, Lam Christopher Z, Macgowan Christopher K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Conventional four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited by long scan times, particularly in pediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates accelerated 4D flow MRI incorporating respiratory compensation and cardiac view sharing in healthy adults and pediatric CHD patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent 5-min free-breathing protocol with a three-dimensional (3D) radial trajectory and compressed sensing reconstruction. The 4D flow MRI reconstruction pipeline was improved by respiratory soft-gating and cardiac view sharing. Flow in major thoracic vessels was compared with two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast MRI, the reference standard.
RESULTS: Fourteen pediatric CHD patients (median age: 13 years (interquartile range (IQR): 5)) and four healthy adult volunteers (median age: 26 years (IQR: 3)) were recruited. Soft-gating improved diaphragm sharpness and reduced respiratory-induced blur (image quality scores: healthy: 46.1 soft-gated vs. 47.2 non-gated; CHD: 47.8 soft-gated vs. 48.2 non-gated). View sharing reduced undersampling artifacts and enhanced the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR, healthy: +9.9%; CHD: +3.8%). In healthy adults, correlations with 2D phase contrast MRI were strong for mean flow (R2=0.94, slope=0.94±0.12, root mean square error (RMSE)=6.4 ml/s; bias=1.1±6.4 ml/s, P=0.45) and peak flow (R2=0.9, slope=0.86±0.13, RMSE=40.9 ml/s; bias=21.3±44.7 ml/s, P=0.04). Similarly, CHD patients showed a strong correlation for mean flow (R2=0.88, slope=0.93±0.09, RMSE=8.3 ml/s) and peak flow (R2=0.97, slope=0.98±0.03, RMSE=25.9 ml/s). Internal consistency for 4D flow MRI in CHD cases showed mean percent differences of 6.1% Main pulmonary artery=Left pulmonary artery+Right pulmonary artery and 6.5% Ascending aorta=Descending aorta+Superior vena cava.
CONCLUSION: The accelerated 4D flow MRI method provides robust flow quantification and visualization in pediatric CHD patients, strongly correlating with 2D phase contrast MRI and completing scans in 5 min for clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates accelerated 4D flow MRI incorporating respiratory compensation and cardiac view sharing in healthy adults and pediatric CHD patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent 5-min free-breathing protocol with a three-dimensional (3D) radial trajectory and compressed sensing reconstruction. The 4D flow MRI reconstruction pipeline was improved by respiratory soft-gating and cardiac view sharing. Flow in major thoracic vessels was compared with two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast MRI, the reference standard.
RESULTS: Fourteen pediatric CHD patients (median age: 13 years (interquartile range (IQR): 5)) and four healthy adult volunteers (median age: 26 years (IQR: 3)) were recruited. Soft-gating improved diaphragm sharpness and reduced respiratory-induced blur (image quality scores: healthy: 46.1 soft-gated vs. 47.2 non-gated; CHD: 47.8 soft-gated vs. 48.2 non-gated). View sharing reduced undersampling artifacts and enhanced the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR, healthy: +9.9%; CHD: +3.8%). In healthy adults, correlations with 2D phase contrast MRI were strong for mean flow (R2=0.94, slope=0.94±0.12, root mean square error (RMSE)=6.4 ml/s; bias=1.1±6.4 ml/s, P=0.45) and peak flow (R2=0.9, slope=0.86±0.13, RMSE=40.9 ml/s; bias=21.3±44.7 ml/s, P=0.04). Similarly, CHD patients showed a strong correlation for mean flow (R2=0.88, slope=0.93±0.09, RMSE=8.3 ml/s) and peak flow (R2=0.97, slope=0.98±0.03, RMSE=25.9 ml/s). Internal consistency for 4D flow MRI in CHD cases showed mean percent differences of 6.1% Main pulmonary artery=Left pulmonary artery+Right pulmonary artery and 6.5% Ascending aorta=Descending aorta+Superior vena cava.
CONCLUSION: The accelerated 4D flow MRI method provides robust flow quantification and visualization in pediatric CHD patients, strongly correlating with 2D phase contrast MRI and completing scans in 5 min for clinical use.