Acta cytologica · 2007
New cytologic clues in localized Leishmania lymphadenitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Daneshbod Yahya, Daneshbod Khosrow, Khademi Bijan, Negahban Shahrzad, Bedayat Gholam-Reza
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe new cytologic clues to diagnose localized leishmania lymphadenitis (LLL).
STUDY DESIGN: The study examined cytologic smears of 170 cases of LLL referred to our department from November 1989 to October 2004. A total of 120 cases were confirmed by detecting Leishman-Donovan (LD) bodies in at least 1 of the cytologic smears and 50 cases, which were histologically confirmed. For comparison we studied cytologic smears of 20 cases of tuberculous lymphadenitis, 20 cases of toxoplasma lymphadenitis and 20 cases of granulomatous lymphadenitis of unspecified causes.
RESULTS: Cases were divided into 4 major groups. Cytologic findings in these groups were studied to find highly suggestive clues. Cytologic findings present in most of these groups, but absent or very rare in other granulomatous lymphadenitis, were LD kinetoplasts, plasma cells with different shapes of inclusions and lymphogranular bodies. Rare findings not reported previously were: intraneutrophilic LD bodies, hematoxylin body-like inclusions, fibroblasts, cytoplasmic blebbing and floating parasitophorous vacuoles.
CONCLUSION: Despite previous reports emphasizing detecting LD bodies in diagnosing LLL, we present cytologic clues highly suggestive of this self-limited disease when LD bodies cannot be detected or are very few on the smears.
STUDY DESIGN: The study examined cytologic smears of 170 cases of LLL referred to our department from November 1989 to October 2004. A total of 120 cases were confirmed by detecting Leishman-Donovan (LD) bodies in at least 1 of the cytologic smears and 50 cases, which were histologically confirmed. For comparison we studied cytologic smears of 20 cases of tuberculous lymphadenitis, 20 cases of toxoplasma lymphadenitis and 20 cases of granulomatous lymphadenitis of unspecified causes.
RESULTS: Cases were divided into 4 major groups. Cytologic findings in these groups were studied to find highly suggestive clues. Cytologic findings present in most of these groups, but absent or very rare in other granulomatous lymphadenitis, were LD kinetoplasts, plasma cells with different shapes of inclusions and lymphogranular bodies. Rare findings not reported previously were: intraneutrophilic LD bodies, hematoxylin body-like inclusions, fibroblasts, cytoplasmic blebbing and floating parasitophorous vacuoles.
CONCLUSION: Despite previous reports emphasizing detecting LD bodies in diagnosing LLL, we present cytologic clues highly suggestive of this self-limited disease when LD bodies cannot be detected or are very few on the smears.