Neuromuscular disorders : NMD · 2004
New potent mexiletine and tocainide analogues evaluated in vivo and in vitro as antimyotonic agents on the myotonic ADR mouse.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Luca Annamaria, Pierno Sabata, Liantonio Antonella, Desaphy Jean-François, Natuzzi Fedele, Didonna Maria Paola, Ferrannini Ermanno, Jockusch Harald, Franchini Carlo, Lentini Giovanni, Corbo Filomena, Tortorella Vincenzo, Camerino Diana Conte
Аннотация
The antimyotonic activity of chiral derivatives of mexiletine and tocainide, selected as potent use-dependent blockers of skeletal muscle sodium channels, was evaluated in vivo acutely in myotonic ADR mice. The compounds had either aromatic (Me4 and Me6) or branched isopropyl groups (Me5 and To1) on the asymmetric centre, or had this latter one methylene apart from the amino group (Me2). Therapeutic doses of mexiletine (5-10 mg/kg) and tocainide (7-20 mg/kg) significantly reduced the long time of righting reflex (TRR), typical of ADR mice. Me4, Me5 and Me6 were 2-fold more potent than mexiletine. To1 fully normalised the TRR at 7 mg/kg. The electromyographic analysis confirmed a muscle-based activity for drug effectiveness on TRR. All the compounds reduced the myotonic hyperexcitability of intercostal muscle fibres when tested in vitro by current-clamp recordings, with a potency correlated with their action on sodium channels. On stimulus-evoked firing, the isopropyl analogues were 2-4-fold more potent than parent compounds, while the aromatic analogues were about 10-fold more potent than mexiletine. Patch-clamp recordings confirmed a normal-like pharmacological sensitivity of sodium channels of native ADR muscle fibres. Finally, the in vivo antimyotonic activity is due to the block of sodium channels and divergences with in vitro potency can be related to structure-based changes in drug pharmacokinetics.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Action PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectric ConductivityElectromyographyFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesInhibitory Concentration 50MaleMexiletineMiceMice, Mutant StrainsMuscle ContractionMyotonic DisordersPatch-Clamp TechniquesSodium ChannelsStructure-Activity RelationshipTime FactorsTocainide