Clinical challenges and knowledge gaps in molar incisor hypomineralization: a cross-sectional survey with an illustrative case report.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The aim was to describe the main clinical challenges in managing molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH), evaluate dental practitioners' knowledge and clinical decision-making, and illustrate a timed extraction approach through a clinical case.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: A narrative review was combined with a cross-sectional digital questionnaire assessing dental practitioners' knowledge, diagnostic ability, and treatment preferences, stratified by experience (≤ 10 years vs > 10 years) and training (general dental practitioners vs specialists/residents). Scores were calculated on a 0 to 100 scale. Additionally, a case report of an 8.5-year-old girl with bilateral post-eruptive breakdown (PEB) of maxillary first permanent molars was presented to demonstrate the management of severe MIH.
RESULTS
A total of 145 dental practitioners participated: 61.4% general dental practitioners and 38.6% specialists/residents. Specialists/residents scored significantly higher than general dental practitioners (P .05), particularly in diagnostic and management domains. Glass-ionomer restorations were the most frequently chosen treatment (43%), followed by stainless steel crowns (26%). Younger practitioners more often selected inlays/onlays. The case demonstrated favorable eruption of second molars following timed extraction.
CONCLUSION
MIH management requires early diagnosis and severity-based treatment planning. Persistent knowledge gaps, especially among general dental practitioners, emphasize the need for enhanced continuing education. Timed extraction, when appropriately planned, may provide a predictable outcome in severe MIH cases.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.