Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2010
Delayed release phosphatidylcholine in chronic-active ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blinded, dose finding study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stremmel Wolfgang, Braun Annika, Hanemann Anja, Ehehalt Robert, Autschbach Frank, Karner Max
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In 2 preceding studies, delayed release phosphatidylcholine (rPC) was found to (a) improve disease activity and (b) withdraw steroids in patients with chronic-active ulcerative colitis.
GOAL: Objective of the study was to determine the most effective rPC dose with least adverse events.
STUDY: A randomized, dose-controlled, double-blinded study. Four groups of 10 patients each with nonsteroid-treated, chronic-active ulcerative pancolitis with a clinical activity index (CAI) and endoscopic activity index (EAI) >or=7. Patients were treated with oral rPC at doses of 0.5, 1, 3, and 4 g daily over 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The CAI changes from baseline to the end of the study were 2.5 (0.5 g), 7.0 (1 g), 5.5 (3 g), and 6.0 (4 g dose arm). Significant improvement of the CAI was registered between the lowest rPC dose of 0.5 g (control group) and all higher doses of 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0-g rPC (P<or=0.05). Remission (CAI <or=3) was reached in 5/10 and 6/10 patients in the 3 and 4-g dose groups compared with no patients in the 0.5-g arm (P=0.033). In the 1-g dose group only 3/10 patients reached remission (P=0.21). The rates of clinical response (>or=50% CAI improvement) were 70% in all of the effective dose groups (1 to 4 g, P=0.003). This was paralleled by the EAI improvement and by the rates of mucosal healing. Median time to clinical response was 5 (IQR 2 to 8) weeks. Bloating was registered in 40% of the patients irrespective of the treatment dose. Three of the 10 patients in the 4 g dose group reported nausea.
CONCLUSION: We found a saturable dose response of rPC in the treatment of chronic-active ulcerative colitis with effective doses >or=1 g per day; doses of 3 and 4 g seem to be superior in achieving remission.
GOAL: Objective of the study was to determine the most effective rPC dose with least adverse events.
STUDY: A randomized, dose-controlled, double-blinded study. Four groups of 10 patients each with nonsteroid-treated, chronic-active ulcerative pancolitis with a clinical activity index (CAI) and endoscopic activity index (EAI) >or=7. Patients were treated with oral rPC at doses of 0.5, 1, 3, and 4 g daily over 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The CAI changes from baseline to the end of the study were 2.5 (0.5 g), 7.0 (1 g), 5.5 (3 g), and 6.0 (4 g dose arm). Significant improvement of the CAI was registered between the lowest rPC dose of 0.5 g (control group) and all higher doses of 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0-g rPC (P<or=0.05). Remission (CAI <or=3) was reached in 5/10 and 6/10 patients in the 3 and 4-g dose groups compared with no patients in the 0.5-g arm (P=0.033). In the 1-g dose group only 3/10 patients reached remission (P=0.21). The rates of clinical response (>or=50% CAI improvement) were 70% in all of the effective dose groups (1 to 4 g, P=0.003). This was paralleled by the EAI improvement and by the rates of mucosal healing. Median time to clinical response was 5 (IQR 2 to 8) weeks. Bloating was registered in 40% of the patients irrespective of the treatment dose. Three of the 10 patients in the 4 g dose group reported nausea.
CONCLUSION: We found a saturable dose response of rPC in the treatment of chronic-active ulcerative colitis with effective doses >or=1 g per day; doses of 3 and 4 g seem to be superior in achieving remission.