International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2019
Point of care, clinician-performed laryngeal ultrasound and pediatric vocal fold movement impairment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Wynne Q, Lambert Elton M, Ongkasuwan Julina
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Vocal fold movement impairment (VFMI) is a well-known sequela of cervical and thoracic procedures performed in the vicinity of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Interpretation of flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) can be difficult in young children due to crying, secretions, and obstructing supraglottic structures. We have previously published on the use of radiologist performed and interpreted, laryngeal ultrasound (LUS) to evaluate vocal fold mobility with substantial agreement with FNL in infants in the cardiovascular intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate point of care, clinician performed, LUS for vocal fold mobility in a pediatric voice clinic.
METHODS: LUS and FNL were performed and recorded on 30 consecutive patients (11 with a clinical diagnosis of VFMI and 19 with clinically normal mobility) in a pediatric voice clinic. All LUS was performed by a single clinician (reviewer 1) with a GE logiq P9 and 12 MHz linear probe. Deidentified recordings of the LUS and FNL (without sound) were reviewed in random order by 2 fellowship trained pediatric otolaryngologists who were blinded to the vocal fold mobility. Cohen's kappa was used to determine agreement.
RESULTS: There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.7) between the reviewers regarding interpretation of LUS as well as regarding interpretation of FNL κ = 0.7802. In addition, each reviewer had near perfect to substantial agreement between their interpretation of the LUS and FNL (reviewer 1 κ = 0.9294 and reviewer 2 κ = 0.8413).
CONCLUSION: Point of care, clinician performed, LUS can be used for the identification of VFMI with substantial agreement with FNL with good inter-rater reliability. This provides clinicians with another tool in their armamentarium for the evaluation of challenging larynges.
METHODS: LUS and FNL were performed and recorded on 30 consecutive patients (11 with a clinical diagnosis of VFMI and 19 with clinically normal mobility) in a pediatric voice clinic. All LUS was performed by a single clinician (reviewer 1) with a GE logiq P9 and 12 MHz linear probe. Deidentified recordings of the LUS and FNL (without sound) were reviewed in random order by 2 fellowship trained pediatric otolaryngologists who were blinded to the vocal fold mobility. Cohen's kappa was used to determine agreement.
RESULTS: There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.7) between the reviewers regarding interpretation of LUS as well as regarding interpretation of FNL κ = 0.7802. In addition, each reviewer had near perfect to substantial agreement between their interpretation of the LUS and FNL (reviewer 1 κ = 0.9294 and reviewer 2 κ = 0.8413).
CONCLUSION: Point of care, clinician performed, LUS can be used for the identification of VFMI with substantial agreement with FNL with good inter-rater reliability. This provides clinicians with another tool in their armamentarium for the evaluation of challenging larynges.