Hormone research in paediatrics · 2022
Approaches to Identify Factors Associated with Pubertal Timing in Self-Limited Delayed Puberty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhu Jia, Liu Enju, Feld Amalia, Jonsdottir-Lewis Elfa, Shirey Alexandria, Feldman Henry A, Astley Christina M, Chan Yee-Ming
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Children with self-limited delayed puberty (DP) (constitutional delay) enter puberty after variable waiting times, and the factors associated with their eventual pubertal timing are not well understood.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 99 girls and 228 boys with self-limited DP at an academic medical center between 2000 and 2015. To define features and potential subtypes of self-limited DP, we performed group-based trajectory modeling on childhood growth and latent-variable factor analysis on clinical characteristics. We then conducted time-to-event analyses to identify associations with pubertal timing.
RESULTS: We identified two distinct growth trajectories in individuals with self-limited DP: one with stable and the other with declining height percentiles. Latent-variable factor analysis identified five factors underlying clinical variation that appear to correspond to genetic height potential, body mass index, childhood growth, parental pubertal delay, and medical issues (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and inhaled glucocorticoid use). We observed correlations between pubertal timing and bone age (p = 0.01), childhood height (p = 0.004), and midparental target height (p < 0.001), but not with parental pubertal delay or with testosterone treatment in boys.
CONCLUSIONS: By illustrating the heterogeneity within self-limited DP and identifying factors underlying this heterogeneity, our study suggests that there may be multiple causes of self-limited DP. However, our ability to determine when puberty will eventually occur remains limited. Dissecting self-limited DP into its component subtypes may inform future studies of the mechanisms contributing to pubertal delay as well as studies of the short- and long-term outcomes of self-limited DP.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 99 girls and 228 boys with self-limited DP at an academic medical center between 2000 and 2015. To define features and potential subtypes of self-limited DP, we performed group-based trajectory modeling on childhood growth and latent-variable factor analysis on clinical characteristics. We then conducted time-to-event analyses to identify associations with pubertal timing.
RESULTS: We identified two distinct growth trajectories in individuals with self-limited DP: one with stable and the other with declining height percentiles. Latent-variable factor analysis identified five factors underlying clinical variation that appear to correspond to genetic height potential, body mass index, childhood growth, parental pubertal delay, and medical issues (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and inhaled glucocorticoid use). We observed correlations between pubertal timing and bone age (p = 0.01), childhood height (p = 0.004), and midparental target height (p < 0.001), but not with parental pubertal delay or with testosterone treatment in boys.
CONCLUSIONS: By illustrating the heterogeneity within self-limited DP and identifying factors underlying this heterogeneity, our study suggests that there may be multiple causes of self-limited DP. However, our ability to determine when puberty will eventually occur remains limited. Dissecting self-limited DP into its component subtypes may inform future studies of the mechanisms contributing to pubertal delay as well as studies of the short- and long-term outcomes of self-limited DP.