Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia in the Netherlands: A Delphi Study to Develop National Consensus.
СтатьяConsensus StatementПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Centen Liesanne M, Ackermans Linda, Buizer Annemieke I, Contarino M Fiorella, Dijk Joke M, Duits Annelien A, Hoffmann Carel, Kuijf Mark L, Kusnadi Irene, Oterdoom D L Marinus, van de Pol Laura A, Schuurman P Rick, Tijssen Marina A J, van Egmond Martje E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Predicting outcome for individuals with dystonia undergoing treatment with deep brain stimulation (DBS) remains challenging. This is further complicated by a lack of uniform screening, follow-up, and heterogeneous outcome measures. This study aims to achieve consensus on a national level among experts in the field to develop an agreed set of outcome measures and introduce more uniformity in the process of preoperative screening and follow-up.
METHODS: A modified Delphi process was conducted among experts in the field of DBS for dystonia. The process consisted of an inventory round, followed by two rounds of Delphi questionnaires, closing with a digital consensus meeting. Experts rated the importance of items within several categories: ((non-)motor symptoms, selection criteria, follow-up, DBS-related aspects, involved care providers). A threshold of 70% was maintained as consensus criterium.
RESULTS: After the first two rounds, consensus was reached on 40/59 items (adult DBS), and 47/61 items (pediatric DBS). The remaining items were rephrased into 28 statements (13 adult DBS, 13 pediatric DBS, and 2 concerning both) and voted on during a final consensus meeting. There, 23/28 statements (11 adult, 11 pediatric, 1 both) reached consensus. Overall, after three rounds, on most items consensus was reached.
DISCUSSION: In this Delphi study, a high level of consensus among national experts was achieved on outcome measures and the process of screening and follow-up in DBS for dystonia for adults and children. The results present national consensus and offer an excellent start for collaborative international studies on best practice for DBS in dystonia.
METHODS: A modified Delphi process was conducted among experts in the field of DBS for dystonia. The process consisted of an inventory round, followed by two rounds of Delphi questionnaires, closing with a digital consensus meeting. Experts rated the importance of items within several categories: ((non-)motor symptoms, selection criteria, follow-up, DBS-related aspects, involved care providers). A threshold of 70% was maintained as consensus criterium.
RESULTS: After the first two rounds, consensus was reached on 40/59 items (adult DBS), and 47/61 items (pediatric DBS). The remaining items were rephrased into 28 statements (13 adult DBS, 13 pediatric DBS, and 2 concerning both) and voted on during a final consensus meeting. There, 23/28 statements (11 adult, 11 pediatric, 1 both) reached consensus. Overall, after three rounds, on most items consensus was reached.
DISCUSSION: In this Delphi study, a high level of consensus among national experts was achieved on outcome measures and the process of screening and follow-up in DBS for dystonia for adults and children. The results present national consensus and offer an excellent start for collaborative international studies on best practice for DBS in dystonia.