Pancreas · 2020
Clinical Benefits of Telotristat Ethyl in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors and Low Bowel Movement Frequency: An Observational Patient-Reported Outcomes Study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Benson Al B, Strosberg Jonathan, Joish Vijay N, Dharba Samyukta, Sapre Dipa, Lapuerta Pablo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptoms and the real-world effectiveness of telotristat ethyl (TE) among patients with ≤3 bowel movements (BM) per day.
METHODS: Patients with CS initiating TE between March and November 2017 could participate in a nurse support program collecting demographic and CS symptom data before TE initiation (baseline) and during ≥1 monthly follow-up within 3 months. Symptoms for patients averaging ≤3 BM/d at baseline were evaluated using pre/post-Student t tests.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients reported ≤3 BM/d at baseline. Symptom burden was high and similar to participants with higher daily BM frequency. After 3 months of TE, most patients reported stable or improved symptoms with significant improvements in urgency (88%; mean [SD], -13.2 [32.2]), stool consistency (88%; -1.3 [2.0]), BMs per day (81%; -0.2 [1.2]), abdominal pain (86%; -13.7 [25.8]), nausea (85%; -30.9 [35.7]), and daily flushing episodes (83%; -1.7 [4.4]; all except BMs per day, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis illustrates high CS symptom burden among patients with relatively low daily BM frequency. After initiating TE, patients reported significant improvements in urgency, stool consistency, abdominal pain, nausea, and flushing episodes. Clinicians and population health managers should consider CS symptom burden beyond daily BM frequency when evaluating treatment selection.
METHODS: Patients with CS initiating TE between March and November 2017 could participate in a nurse support program collecting demographic and CS symptom data before TE initiation (baseline) and during ≥1 monthly follow-up within 3 months. Symptoms for patients averaging ≤3 BM/d at baseline were evaluated using pre/post-Student t tests.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients reported ≤3 BM/d at baseline. Symptom burden was high and similar to participants with higher daily BM frequency. After 3 months of TE, most patients reported stable or improved symptoms with significant improvements in urgency (88%; mean [SD], -13.2 [32.2]), stool consistency (88%; -1.3 [2.0]), BMs per day (81%; -0.2 [1.2]), abdominal pain (86%; -13.7 [25.8]), nausea (85%; -30.9 [35.7]), and daily flushing episodes (83%; -1.7 [4.4]; all except BMs per day, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis illustrates high CS symptom burden among patients with relatively low daily BM frequency. After initiating TE, patients reported significant improvements in urgency, stool consistency, abdominal pain, nausea, and flushing episodes. Clinicians and population health managers should consider CS symptom burden beyond daily BM frequency when evaluating treatment selection.