Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2026
Beyond the Wait-and-See: Data-Driven Decision Points for Guiding Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Treatment and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stimpfl Julia N, Mills Jeffrey A, Dahlsgaard Katherine K, Peris Tara S, Piacentini John C, Walkup John T, Strawn Jeffrey R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify early markers of acute treatment response among youth with anxiety disorders receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy, or their combination.
BACKGROUND: Although many youth with anxiety disorders benefit from CBT or SSRIs, response trajectories vary. Identifying early indicators of nonresponse may guide sequencing strategies and improve timely treatment delivery.
METHODS: Using data from the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study, improvement trajectories were modeled for youth (age 7-17) randomized to sertraline monotherapy (N = 133), CBT monotherapy (N = 139), their combination (N = 140), and placebo (N = 76). Patients were stratified by percent change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) scores at multiple time points, and logarithmic and logistic time-trend regression models were used to estimate the probability of response. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify thresholds of improvement for predicting response.
RESULTS: In the sertraline group, ≥25% improvement in PARS score at week 4 had a higher probability of response by week 12 (60.8%) than <25% improvement (31.7%, p = 0.001). In CBT-treated youth, week 4 PARS improvement was less predictive of response, with ≥25% improvement predicting a 47.9% chance of response compared with 28.6% for <25% improvement (p = 0.025). In the combined treatment, ≥25% improvement predicted a73.3% probability of response, whereas <25% improvement yielded a 51.3% likelihood of response (p < 0.001). ROC analyses similarly suggested that week 4 improvement in PARS scores in the CBT group had near equivocal predictive value, though this improved by week 6 to levels comparable to those of the other treatment groups. At week 6, roughly 25% improvement in PARS score in the combined treatment had the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting response.
CONCLUSIONS: Early improvement can predict treatment response in youth with anxiety disorders receiving sertraline monotherapy or combination treatment (sertraline and CBT). Conversely, the absence of early improvement in CBT-treated youth does not reliably predict treatment nonresponse. Treatment-specific thresholds may inform clinical decision making, and support earlier SSRI optimization while allowing more time to observe CBT-related gains.
BACKGROUND: Although many youth with anxiety disorders benefit from CBT or SSRIs, response trajectories vary. Identifying early indicators of nonresponse may guide sequencing strategies and improve timely treatment delivery.
METHODS: Using data from the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study, improvement trajectories were modeled for youth (age 7-17) randomized to sertraline monotherapy (N = 133), CBT monotherapy (N = 139), their combination (N = 140), and placebo (N = 76). Patients were stratified by percent change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) scores at multiple time points, and logarithmic and logistic time-trend regression models were used to estimate the probability of response. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify thresholds of improvement for predicting response.
RESULTS: In the sertraline group, ≥25% improvement in PARS score at week 4 had a higher probability of response by week 12 (60.8%) than <25% improvement (31.7%, p = 0.001). In CBT-treated youth, week 4 PARS improvement was less predictive of response, with ≥25% improvement predicting a 47.9% chance of response compared with 28.6% for <25% improvement (p = 0.025). In the combined treatment, ≥25% improvement predicted a73.3% probability of response, whereas <25% improvement yielded a 51.3% likelihood of response (p < 0.001). ROC analyses similarly suggested that week 4 improvement in PARS scores in the CBT group had near equivocal predictive value, though this improved by week 6 to levels comparable to those of the other treatment groups. At week 6, roughly 25% improvement in PARS score in the combined treatment had the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting response.
CONCLUSIONS: Early improvement can predict treatment response in youth with anxiety disorders receiving sertraline monotherapy or combination treatment (sertraline and CBT). Conversely, the absence of early improvement in CBT-treated youth does not reliably predict treatment nonresponse. Treatment-specific thresholds may inform clinical decision making, and support earlier SSRI optimization while allowing more time to observe CBT-related gains.