Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2020
AVAPS-AE versus ST mode: A randomized controlled trial in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patout Maxime, Gagnadoux Frédéric, Rabec Claudio, Trzepizur Wojciech, Georges Marjolaine, Perrin Christophe, Tamisier Renaud, Pépin Jean-Louis, Llontop Claudia, Attali Valerie, Goutorbe Frederic, Pontier-Marchandise Sandrine, Cervantes Pierre, Bironneau Vanessa, Portmann Adriana, Delrieu Jacqueline, Cuvelier Antoine, Muir Jean-François
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Average volume-assured pressure support-automated expiratory positive airway pressure (AVAPS-AE) combines an automated positive expiratory pressure to maintain upper airway patency to an automated pressure support with a targeted tidal volume. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2-month AVAPS-AE ventilation versus pressure support (ST) ventilation on objective sleep quality in stable patients with OHS. Secondary outcomes included arterial blood gases, health-related quality of life, daytime sleepiness, subjective sleep quality and compliance to NIV.
METHODS: This is a prospective multicentric randomized controlled trial. Consecutive OHS patients included had daytime Pa CO2 > 6 kPa, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 , clinical stability for more than 2 weeks and were naive from home NIV. PSG were analysed centrally by two independent experts. Primary endpoint was sleep quality improvement at 2 months.
RESULTS: Among 69 trial patients, 60 patients had successful NIV setup. Baseline and follow-up PSG were available for 26 patients randomized in the ST group and 30 in the AVAPS-AE group. At baseline, Pa CO2 was 6.94 ± 0.71 kPa in the ST group and 6.61 ± 0.71 in the AVAPS-AE group (P = 0.032). No significant between-group difference was observed for objective sleep quality indices. Improvement in Pa CO2 was similar between groups with a mean reduction of -0.87 kPa (95% CI: -1.12 to -0.46) in the ST group versus -0.87 kPa (95% CI: -1.14 to -0.50) in the AVAPS-AE group (P = 0.984). Mean NIV use was 6.2 h per night in both groups (P = 0.93). NIV setup duration was shorter in the AVAPS-AE group (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: AVAPS-AE and ST ventilation for 2 months had similar impact on sleep quality and gas exchange.
METHODS: This is a prospective multicentric randomized controlled trial. Consecutive OHS patients included had daytime Pa CO2 > 6 kPa, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 , clinical stability for more than 2 weeks and were naive from home NIV. PSG were analysed centrally by two independent experts. Primary endpoint was sleep quality improvement at 2 months.
RESULTS: Among 69 trial patients, 60 patients had successful NIV setup. Baseline and follow-up PSG were available for 26 patients randomized in the ST group and 30 in the AVAPS-AE group. At baseline, Pa CO2 was 6.94 ± 0.71 kPa in the ST group and 6.61 ± 0.71 in the AVAPS-AE group (P = 0.032). No significant between-group difference was observed for objective sleep quality indices. Improvement in Pa CO2 was similar between groups with a mean reduction of -0.87 kPa (95% CI: -1.12 to -0.46) in the ST group versus -0.87 kPa (95% CI: -1.14 to -0.50) in the AVAPS-AE group (P = 0.984). Mean NIV use was 6.2 h per night in both groups (P = 0.93). NIV setup duration was shorter in the AVAPS-AE group (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: AVAPS-AE and ST ventilation for 2 months had similar impact on sleep quality and gas exchange.