m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025

Predicting Cochlear Synaptopathy in Mice with Varying Degrees of Outer Hair Cell Dysfunction Using Auditory Evoked Potentials.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Buran Brad N, Elkins Seán, He Wenxuan, Verhulst Sarah, Bramhall Naomi F

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Although human temporal bones suggest that cochlear synapse numbers decline with age and noise exposure, no validated diagnostic method exists. In animal models, cochlear synaptopathy is associated with reduced auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave 1 amplitude and envelope following response (EFR) magnitude for a sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tone. However, measuring SAM EFR at the optimal modulation frequency (1000 Hz) is difficult in humans. A rectangular amplitude modulated (RAM) tone may be more sensitive to synaptopathy, but this has not been validated in animals. In addition, because synaptopathy likely co-occurs with outer hair cell dysfunction (OHC), a diagnostic assay needs to be robust to abnormal auditory thresholds. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative ability of ABR and EFR measures to predict synapse numbers in mice with varying degrees of synaptopathy and OHC dysfunction.

METHODS: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), ABR, SAM EFR, and RAM EFR were recorded from 57 mice with a range of auditory thresholds and degrees of synaptopathy. Cross-validation was used to compare the relative ability of linear regression models incorporating different measures to predict synapse numbers. Predictions were confirmed histologically.

RESULTS: RAM EFR modulated at 1000 Hz was the single best predictor of synapse numbers for broad synapse loss across frequency, while combining RAM EFR with ABR further improved predictions. In contrast, ABR best predicted focal synaptopathy. Incorporating DPOAEs improved predictions for EFR, but not ABR.

CONCLUSION: RAM EFR, ABR, and DPOAEs should be used in the future when predicting synapse numbers.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты