Neurosurgery · 1996
Pericytosis and edema generation: a unique clinicopathological variant of meningioma.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robinson J C, Challa V R, Jones D S, Kelly D L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We report a group of eight patients with a distinctive histological variant of meningioma that is associated with severe peritumoral edema. The clinical presentation, radiographic findings, and histology of this type of tumor may lead to misdiagnosis as an aggressive or malignant process.
METHODS: We reviewed the histology from patients who had removal of meningiomas performed in our institution between 1978 and 1992. Tumors having abnormal proliferation of cells in the intramural vascular spaces were selected for study; case histories and radiographs were reviewed. Tumor material was subjected to special stains, immunocytochemical examination, and election microscopy.
RESULTS: Several lesions were misread radiographically as being malignant. Patients underwent craniotomy with complete excision of the tumor. All lesions were small (< or = 3 cm), and no brain invasion, unusual tumor vascularity, or dural sinus involvement was noted in any case. Histologically, the meningioma pattern in each case was meningothelial and benign in appearance. The immunocytochemical and electron microscopic features of the unusual cells in the blood vessel walls are most consistent with their being of pericytic origin. All patients have remained asymptomatic and without evidence of tumor recurrence with follow-up from 3 to 12 years.
CONCLUSION: These tumors showed proliferation of pericytes in blood vessel walls and represent a new subtype of meningothelial meningioma. The apparently benign nature of these lesions necessitates their recognition. Characteristic findings of pericytic proliferation associated with edema generation have led us to descriptively term this the PEG variant of meningioma.
METHODS: We reviewed the histology from patients who had removal of meningiomas performed in our institution between 1978 and 1992. Tumors having abnormal proliferation of cells in the intramural vascular spaces were selected for study; case histories and radiographs were reviewed. Tumor material was subjected to special stains, immunocytochemical examination, and election microscopy.
RESULTS: Several lesions were misread radiographically as being malignant. Patients underwent craniotomy with complete excision of the tumor. All lesions were small (< or = 3 cm), and no brain invasion, unusual tumor vascularity, or dural sinus involvement was noted in any case. Histologically, the meningioma pattern in each case was meningothelial and benign in appearance. The immunocytochemical and electron microscopic features of the unusual cells in the blood vessel walls are most consistent with their being of pericytic origin. All patients have remained asymptomatic and without evidence of tumor recurrence with follow-up from 3 to 12 years.
CONCLUSION: These tumors showed proliferation of pericytes in blood vessel walls and represent a new subtype of meningothelial meningioma. The apparently benign nature of these lesions necessitates their recognition. Characteristic findings of pericytic proliferation associated with edema generation have led us to descriptively term this the PEG variant of meningioma.