The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
Acute gastric injury after ingestion of substrate with hyperosmolar glucose and benzoate inversely related with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Yeon Ji, Paik Chang Nyol, Lee Ji-Min, Kim Dae Bum, Yang Jin Mo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms and the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) could be determined after ingestion of substrate with highly concentrated glucose for glucose breath test (GBT), after which endoscopic images for acute gastric injury have not been clarified. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence and relationship of acute gastric injury with SIBO after GBT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 235 patients with functional gastrointestinal symptoms undergoing breath test with 50 g glucose solution, immediately followed by upper endoscopy were surveyed. The acute gastric injury in endoscopic images and the GBT for hydrogen (H2) or methane (CH4) were assessed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of acute gastric injury was 28.1% (66/235) after GBT. There were significant differences in GBT positivity (+) with and without gastric injury (25.8% vs 40.8%, p=0.03). In subtypes, GBT (H2) + was significantly lower in group with gastric injury than in the group without. No differences were seen in GBT (CH4) + between two groups. On multivariate analysis, the subtype of GBT (H2) + (Odds ratio (OR)=0.42; 95% Confidence interval (CI)=0.20-0.90; p=0.03) inversely and female (OR=2.11; 95% CI=1.11-4.00; p=0.02) were significantly related with gastric injury. Whereas gastric injury was the only independent related factor for GBT + inversely (OR=0.51; 95% CI=0.27-0.97; p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: Highly concentrated glucose might provoke acute gastric injury, which could predict the absence of SIBO.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 235 patients with functional gastrointestinal symptoms undergoing breath test with 50 g glucose solution, immediately followed by upper endoscopy were surveyed. The acute gastric injury in endoscopic images and the GBT for hydrogen (H2) or methane (CH4) were assessed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of acute gastric injury was 28.1% (66/235) after GBT. There were significant differences in GBT positivity (+) with and without gastric injury (25.8% vs 40.8%, p=0.03). In subtypes, GBT (H2) + was significantly lower in group with gastric injury than in the group without. No differences were seen in GBT (CH4) + between two groups. On multivariate analysis, the subtype of GBT (H2) + (Odds ratio (OR)=0.42; 95% Confidence interval (CI)=0.20-0.90; p=0.03) inversely and female (OR=2.11; 95% CI=1.11-4.00; p=0.02) were significantly related with gastric injury. Whereas gastric injury was the only independent related factor for GBT + inversely (OR=0.51; 95% CI=0.27-0.97; p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: Highly concentrated glucose might provoke acute gastric injury, which could predict the absence of SIBO.