MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0008-4182(05)80008-0

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2005

Corneal honeybee sting.

Teoh Stephen C B, Lee Jong-Jian, Fam Han-Bor

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We report the complications and management of a retained bee sting injury to the cornea. The case highlights the acute and chronic management of an uncommon injury and its pathogenesis.

METHODS

A 67-year-old man was attacked by a swarm of bees and was referred for severe chemosis on the right eye. A retained corneal bee stinger (ovipositor) was seen but removal was only partially successful. He subsequently developed a large corneal epithelial defect, anterior uveitis, intractable glaucoma, traumatic cataract, toxic optic neuropathy, and corneal scarring. We reviewed the literature on corneal bee sting injuries and their complications.

RESULTS

Inflammation was controlled with topical steroids and the patient underwent a combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C for uncontrolled glaucoma. However, optic neuropathy did not resolve.

INTERPRETATION: Corneal bee sting injuries are uncommon but can result in severe sight-threatening complications such as toxic optic neuropathy. Early recognition of the possible complications and appropriate treatment may help to prevent permanent loss of vision. Removal of a retained corneal bee stinger remains controversial.

Для цитирования: Teoh Stephen C B, Lee Jong-Jian, Fam Han-Bor. Corneal honeybee sting.. Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/s0008-4182(05)80008-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.