Urology · 2023
Perceived Barriers Among Underrepresented and Historically Marginalized Medical Students Pursuing a Career in Urology.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schoenfeld Daniel, Ingram Justin, Wiederhon Jo, Joice Gregory A, Badalato Gina M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess perceived barriers to pursuing urology among medical students and to determine if marginalized groups identified greater challenges to entry.
METHODS: The Deans of all New York medical schools were asked to disseminate a survey to their students. The survey collected demographic information to identify underrepresented minorities, students of low socioeconomic background, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals. Students were asked to rate various survey items on a five-point Likert scale to determine which factors were perceived as barriers to applying to urology residency. Student t tests and ANOVA were used to compare mean Likert ratings between groups.
RESULTS: A total of 256 students responded to the survey from 47% of medical institutions. Underrepresented minorities students cited lack of evident diversity within the field as a more significant barrier than counterparts (3.2 vs 2.7, P= .025). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual students perceived the lack of evident diversity within urology (3.1 vs 2.65, P = .01), exclusivity of the field (3.73 vs 3.29, P = .04), and fear that residency programs would have negative perceptions of them as students (3.0 vs 2.1, P < .0001) as substantial obstacles compared to peers. Students with childhood household incomes less than $40,000 cited socioeconomic concerns as a higher barrier compared to students with household incomes greater than $40,000 (3.2 vs 2.3, P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Underrepresented and historically marginalized students perceive more significant barriers to pursuing urology than their peers. Urology training programs must continue to foster an inclusive environment to recruit prospective students from already marginalized groups.
METHODS: The Deans of all New York medical schools were asked to disseminate a survey to their students. The survey collected demographic information to identify underrepresented minorities, students of low socioeconomic background, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals. Students were asked to rate various survey items on a five-point Likert scale to determine which factors were perceived as barriers to applying to urology residency. Student t tests and ANOVA were used to compare mean Likert ratings between groups.
RESULTS: A total of 256 students responded to the survey from 47% of medical institutions. Underrepresented minorities students cited lack of evident diversity within the field as a more significant barrier than counterparts (3.2 vs 2.7, P= .025). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual students perceived the lack of evident diversity within urology (3.1 vs 2.65, P = .01), exclusivity of the field (3.73 vs 3.29, P = .04), and fear that residency programs would have negative perceptions of them as students (3.0 vs 2.1, P < .0001) as substantial obstacles compared to peers. Students with childhood household incomes less than $40,000 cited socioeconomic concerns as a higher barrier compared to students with household incomes greater than $40,000 (3.2 vs 2.3, P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Underrepresented and historically marginalized students perceive more significant barriers to pursuing urology than their peers. Urology training programs must continue to foster an inclusive environment to recruit prospective students from already marginalized groups.