Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
Exploring the postoperative sleep experience of colorectal cancer patients with temporary stomas: a descriptive qualitative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wei Xueyan, Tang Liping, Li Jing, Cheng Zhiqiang, Chen Yan, Zhang Baozhen
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the postoperative sleep experience of colorectal cancer patients with temporary stomas.
METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study. Seventeen eligible patients with temporary stomas were purposively sampled and participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Four main themes and 12 subthemes emerged: (1) Treatment-related physical symptoms disrupting sleep (postoperative pain and discomfort; nighttime stoma care burden; Drug-related adverse reactions). (2) Bidirectional reinforcement between psychosocial distress and sleep disturbances (nocturnal rumination in the context of self-perceived burden; nighttime exacerbation of negative emotions; Mutual aggravation of distress and sleep dysfunction). (3) Adaptive challenges to sleep environments and routines (hospital-environmental barriers to sleep; home sleep-environment reorganization; changes in sleep habits). (4) Patient-initiated sleep optimization strategies (self-management techniques for relaxation; dietary modifications; seeking professional support).
CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative sleep experiences of patients with temporary stomas are complex, influenced by multiple factors including physical, psychological, and care-related aspects, and have relatively inadequate supportive measures.
METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study. Seventeen eligible patients with temporary stomas were purposively sampled and participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Four main themes and 12 subthemes emerged: (1) Treatment-related physical symptoms disrupting sleep (postoperative pain and discomfort; nighttime stoma care burden; Drug-related adverse reactions). (2) Bidirectional reinforcement between psychosocial distress and sleep disturbances (nocturnal rumination in the context of self-perceived burden; nighttime exacerbation of negative emotions; Mutual aggravation of distress and sleep dysfunction). (3) Adaptive challenges to sleep environments and routines (hospital-environmental barriers to sleep; home sleep-environment reorganization; changes in sleep habits). (4) Patient-initiated sleep optimization strategies (self-management techniques for relaxation; dietary modifications; seeking professional support).
CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative sleep experiences of patients with temporary stomas are complex, influenced by multiple factors including physical, psychological, and care-related aspects, and have relatively inadequate supportive measures.