Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
The impact of submandibular glands protection on xerostomia as monitored by diffusion-weighted imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Dawei, Fan Wenjun, Jiang Huayong, Meng Lingling, Cai Boning, Zhang Xinxin, Yu Wei, Zhao Lujun, Ma Lin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of sparing submandibular glands (SMGs) on alleviating xerostomia and the functional dynamics of the irradiated parotid glands (PGs) and sublingual glands (SLGs) by diffusion-weighted imaging.
METHODS: 97 participants underwent 9 rounds of DWI scans before IC (pre-IC), pre-radiation (pre-RT), the midpoint of radiation (mid-RT), the end of radiation (post-RT), 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 (12m-RT) months following radiation. Apparent diffusion coefficient of SMGs (ADCSMG), PGs (ADCPG), and SLGs (ADCSLG), xerostomia questionnaire scores (XQ), and saliva flow rate measures under unstimulated (uSFR) and stimulated condition (sSFR) were documented.
RESULTS: ADCPG, ADCSMG, ADCSLG, and XQ showed a rapid increase with a top at 3m-RT followed by regression, whereas uSFR and sSFR had the reverse trend. The change rate of ADC correlated with the dose to PGs, SMGs, and SLGs, as well as uSFR, sSFR, and XQ scores (p < 0.05 for all, except for uSFR with ADCPG (p = 0.063)). Maingroup for ADCPG, uSFR, and sSFR were significant (p values were 0.028, 0.000, 0.000 respectively); ADCPG in SMG sparing group was lower while uSFR, and sSFR were higher than those in the SMG-unsparing group. Simplegroup for ADCSMG, ADCSLG (all p < 0.05 from mid-RT to 12m-RT), and XQ (all p < 0.001 at mid-, 6m-, 9m-, and 12m-RT) were significant; ADCSMG, ADCSLG, and XQ were lower in the SMG-sparing group.
CONCLUSIONS: SMG protection has a great impact on the functional retention of PGs and SLGs, resulting in alleviating xerostomia and improving quality of life.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was also registered with the Chinese Clinical Study Registry (registered number: ChiCTR1900024328, Date: July 6, 2019; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=40726 ).
METHODS: 97 participants underwent 9 rounds of DWI scans before IC (pre-IC), pre-radiation (pre-RT), the midpoint of radiation (mid-RT), the end of radiation (post-RT), 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 (12m-RT) months following radiation. Apparent diffusion coefficient of SMGs (ADCSMG), PGs (ADCPG), and SLGs (ADCSLG), xerostomia questionnaire scores (XQ), and saliva flow rate measures under unstimulated (uSFR) and stimulated condition (sSFR) were documented.
RESULTS: ADCPG, ADCSMG, ADCSLG, and XQ showed a rapid increase with a top at 3m-RT followed by regression, whereas uSFR and sSFR had the reverse trend. The change rate of ADC correlated with the dose to PGs, SMGs, and SLGs, as well as uSFR, sSFR, and XQ scores (p < 0.05 for all, except for uSFR with ADCPG (p = 0.063)). Maingroup for ADCPG, uSFR, and sSFR were significant (p values were 0.028, 0.000, 0.000 respectively); ADCPG in SMG sparing group was lower while uSFR, and sSFR were higher than those in the SMG-unsparing group. Simplegroup for ADCSMG, ADCSLG (all p < 0.05 from mid-RT to 12m-RT), and XQ (all p < 0.001 at mid-, 6m-, 9m-, and 12m-RT) were significant; ADCSMG, ADCSLG, and XQ were lower in the SMG-sparing group.
CONCLUSIONS: SMG protection has a great impact on the functional retention of PGs and SLGs, resulting in alleviating xerostomia and improving quality of life.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was also registered with the Chinese Clinical Study Registry (registered number: ChiCTR1900024328, Date: July 6, 2019; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=40726 ).