The Journal of urology · 1999
Orthotopic urethral substitution in female patients using the mitrofanoff principle.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barroso U, Duel B, Barthold J S, González R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We present our experience with orthotopic urethral substitution in female patients using the Mitrofanoff principle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed orthotopic urethral substitution using the Mitrofanoff principle in 18 female patients 1 to 29 years old (mean age 10). The conduit was constructed with appendix in 13 cases, tapered ileum in 4 and fallopian tube in 1. The etiology of incontinence included exstrophy in 8 patients, neurogenic bladder in 3, urogenital sinus in 3, and bilateral ectopic ureter, ectopic ureterocele, the prune-belly syndrome and post-cystectomy undiversion in 1 each.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 29 months (range 9 to 72). A total of 16 patients achieved continence following a program of clean intermittent catheterization. There were 2 unsuccessful operations. In 1 case the appendix become ischemic and in 1 a vesicoperineal fistula developed. One patient catheterizes every 2 hours to avoid leakage. Catheterization was temporarily difficult in 5 patients, of whom 2 had an appendiceal and 3 had a tapered ileal conduit. Two patients with an ileal conduit have had chronic difficult catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic replacement of the urethra using the Mitrofanoff principle is suitable in highly select female patients who need continent diversion or a catheterizable conduit but who will not accept an abdominal stoma. It is particularly suited to patients in whom exstrophy reconstruction has failed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed orthotopic urethral substitution using the Mitrofanoff principle in 18 female patients 1 to 29 years old (mean age 10). The conduit was constructed with appendix in 13 cases, tapered ileum in 4 and fallopian tube in 1. The etiology of incontinence included exstrophy in 8 patients, neurogenic bladder in 3, urogenital sinus in 3, and bilateral ectopic ureter, ectopic ureterocele, the prune-belly syndrome and post-cystectomy undiversion in 1 each.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 29 months (range 9 to 72). A total of 16 patients achieved continence following a program of clean intermittent catheterization. There were 2 unsuccessful operations. In 1 case the appendix become ischemic and in 1 a vesicoperineal fistula developed. One patient catheterizes every 2 hours to avoid leakage. Catheterization was temporarily difficult in 5 patients, of whom 2 had an appendiceal and 3 had a tapered ileal conduit. Two patients with an ileal conduit have had chronic difficult catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic replacement of the urethra using the Mitrofanoff principle is suitable in highly select female patients who need continent diversion or a catheterizable conduit but who will not accept an abdominal stoma. It is particularly suited to patients in whom exstrophy reconstruction has failed.