Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
Comprehensive assessment reveals numerous clinical and neurophysiological differences between MECP2-allelic disorders.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pehlivan Davut, Huang Chengjun, Harris Holly K, Coquery Christine, Mahat Aditya, Maletic-Savatic Mirjana, Mignon Laurence, Aras Sukru, Glaze Daniel G, Layne Charles S, Sahelijo Leonardo, Zoghbi Huda Y, McGinley Matthew J, Suter Bernhard
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Rett syndrome (RTT) and MECP2 duplication syndrome (MDS) result from under- and overexpression of MECP2, respectively. Preclinical studies using genetic-based treatment showed robust phenotype recovery for both MDS and RTT. However, there is a risk of converting MDS to RTT, or vice versa, if accurate MeCP2 levels are not achieved. The aim of this study was to identify biomarkers distinguishing RTT from MDS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 11 MDS and 6 male RTT like (MRL) individuals for a panel of clinical and neurophysiological assessments over two visits, 8-10 months apart.
RESULTS: We identified numerous clinical and physiological features as promising biomarkers. MRL individuals exhibited large amplitude whole body tremor, midline stereotypies (vs. hand flapping at sides in MDS), earlier neuromotor regression, and earlier onset but less commonly refractory epilepsy. In the neurophysiological domain, we observed several marked differences in sleep physiology between MDS/MRL and typically developing (TD) individuals including reduced sleeping time, increased delta power during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, decreased occipital alpha and increased brain-wide delta power during wakefulness, and reduced spindle density and duration. MRL individuals also had much lower delta power during NREM 2 and 3 stages than the TD group. We found differences in spindle duration in the temporal lobes and spindle amplitude in the frontal lobes between MDS and MRL.
DISCUSSION: Our study revealed distinct clinical features of MDS and MRL that can be monitored during a clinical trial and may serve as target engagement, disease progression, or safety biomarkers for interventional studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 11 MDS and 6 male RTT like (MRL) individuals for a panel of clinical and neurophysiological assessments over two visits, 8-10 months apart.
RESULTS: We identified numerous clinical and physiological features as promising biomarkers. MRL individuals exhibited large amplitude whole body tremor, midline stereotypies (vs. hand flapping at sides in MDS), earlier neuromotor regression, and earlier onset but less commonly refractory epilepsy. In the neurophysiological domain, we observed several marked differences in sleep physiology between MDS/MRL and typically developing (TD) individuals including reduced sleeping time, increased delta power during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, decreased occipital alpha and increased brain-wide delta power during wakefulness, and reduced spindle density and duration. MRL individuals also had much lower delta power during NREM 2 and 3 stages than the TD group. We found differences in spindle duration in the temporal lobes and spindle amplitude in the frontal lobes between MDS and MRL.
DISCUSSION: Our study revealed distinct clinical features of MDS and MRL that can be monitored during a clinical trial and may serve as target engagement, disease progression, or safety biomarkers for interventional studies.