Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
Computer-assisted Surgery With Bone Anchoring in Otologic Surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Periers Léa, Kazmitcheff Guillaume, Micaletti Fabrice, Mazalaigue Stéphane, De Villars Lucrèce, Bakhos David
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is increasingly used in ENT surgery, notably in sinus and otoneurosurgical procedures. This study assessed the accuracy of a CAN system in temporal bone surgery using bone-anchored registration, without preoperative fiducial screws or facial CT imaging, focusing solely on the temporal bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric temporal bones (5 left, 5 right) underwent high-resolution CT imaging. Dissections (mastoidectomy with facial recess approach) were conducted using the Collin Navigation Solutions system. Surface registration employed the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm based on 3 anatomic landmarks. Positional accuracy (PA) was evaluated for 3 middle ear structures: short process of the incus (INC), head of the malleus (MAL), and anterior margin of the round window (COC) and one internal ear structure: lateral semicircular canal (LSC). PA was defined as the distance between each anatomic point and its corresponding CT location.
RESULTS: Forty measurements were obtained. Initial PA was <1 mm in 77.5% of cases: 70% for both LSC and MAL, 90% for INC, and 80% for COC. The mean PA was 0.67 ± 0.46 mm before reregistration, and improved to 0.44 ± 0.32 mm after reregistration on the LSC. This improvement was statistically significant for LSC ( P = 0.0048) and INC ( P = 0.046), but not for MAL ( P = 0.2443) or COC ( P = 0.952).
CONCLUSION: This study showed encouraging results regarding the accuracy of the CAN system for temporal bone surgery and supports further investigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten cadaveric temporal bones (5 left, 5 right) underwent high-resolution CT imaging. Dissections (mastoidectomy with facial recess approach) were conducted using the Collin Navigation Solutions system. Surface registration employed the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm based on 3 anatomic landmarks. Positional accuracy (PA) was evaluated for 3 middle ear structures: short process of the incus (INC), head of the malleus (MAL), and anterior margin of the round window (COC) and one internal ear structure: lateral semicircular canal (LSC). PA was defined as the distance between each anatomic point and its corresponding CT location.
RESULTS: Forty measurements were obtained. Initial PA was <1 mm in 77.5% of cases: 70% for both LSC and MAL, 90% for INC, and 80% for COC. The mean PA was 0.67 ± 0.46 mm before reregistration, and improved to 0.44 ± 0.32 mm after reregistration on the LSC. This improvement was statistically significant for LSC ( P = 0.0048) and INC ( P = 0.046), but not for MAL ( P = 0.2443) or COC ( P = 0.952).
CONCLUSION: This study showed encouraging results regarding the accuracy of the CAN system for temporal bone surgery and supports further investigation.