Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2017
Efficacy and safety of a coagulated thrombus injection for peripheral artery perforation: The coagulated thrombus hemostasis method.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tokuda Takahiro, Hirano Keisuke, Yamawaki Masahiro, Araki Motoharu, Kobayashi Norihiro, Mori Shinsuke, Sakamoto Yasunari, Takimura Hideyuki, Tsutsumi Masakazu, Ito Yoshiaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study assesses the safety and efficacy of using a thrombus injection for treatment a peripheral artery perforation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2013 to April 2016, we performed 1,152 endovascular treatment (EVT) at our hospital. Of these, 28 peripheral artery perforations occurred during the EVT procedure and 20 were treated with a thrombus, which we artificially created. The thrombus comprised the patient's blood and thrombin. It was injected into the perforation site from the tip of an over-the-wire balloon using ballooning method. The perforated arteries occurred in below-the-knee artery (45%), superficial femoral artery (35%), deep femoral artery (10%), popliteal artery (5%), and external iliac artery (5%). Thrombus injection was successful in 19 of the 20 perforations (95%). One patient required coil embolization. There were no complications during or after admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus injection is a safety method and might be considered as one of the approaches for stopping peripheral artery perforation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2013 to April 2016, we performed 1,152 endovascular treatment (EVT) at our hospital. Of these, 28 peripheral artery perforations occurred during the EVT procedure and 20 were treated with a thrombus, which we artificially created. The thrombus comprised the patient's blood and thrombin. It was injected into the perforation site from the tip of an over-the-wire balloon using ballooning method. The perforated arteries occurred in below-the-knee artery (45%), superficial femoral artery (35%), deep femoral artery (10%), popliteal artery (5%), and external iliac artery (5%). Thrombus injection was successful in 19 of the 20 perforations (95%). One patient required coil embolization. There were no complications during or after admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus injection is a safety method and might be considered as one of the approaches for stopping peripheral artery perforation.