Acta neurochirurgica · 2024
The role of endoscopic endonasal salvage surgery in recurrent or residual craniopharyngioma after a transcranial approach: a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kohli Gurkirat, Gabriel Phabinly J, Brady Melanie, Fang Christina H, Eloy Jean Anderson, Liu James K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The management of craniopharyngiomas is challenging due to their high rate of recurrence following resection. Excision of recurrent tumors poses further surgical challenges due to loss of arachnoidal planes and adherence to anatomical structures. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers a favorable alternative to transcranial approaches for primary craniopharyngiomas. However, the safety and efficacy of EEA for recurrent tumors, specifically after a prior transcranial approach, needs further investigation.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review using PubMed to develop a database of cases of recurrent craniopharyngiomas previously treated with a transcranial approach.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in this review with a total of 75 cases. There were 50 males and 25 females with a mean age of 38 years (range 2-80). One prior transcranial surgery was done in 80.0% of cases, while 8.0% had two and 12.0% had more than two prior surgeries. Radiotherapy after transcranial resection was given in 18 cases (24.0%). Following EEA, vision improved in 60.0% of cases, and vision worsened in 8.6% of the cases. Of cases, 64.4% had pre-existing anterior hypopituitarism, and 43.8% had diabetes insipidus prior to EEA. New anterior hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus developed in 24.6% and 21.9% of cases, respectively following EEA. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 64.0%, subtotal resection in 32.0%, and partial resection in 4.0% revision EEA cases. GTR rate was higher in cases with no prior radiotherapy compared to cases with prior radiotherapy (72.0% vs 39.0%, p = 0.0372). The recurrence rate was 17.5% overall but was significantly lower at 10.0% following GTR (p = 0.0019). The average follow-up length was 41.2 months (range, 1-182 months).
CONCLUSION: The EEA can be utilized for resection of recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas previously managed by a transcranial approach.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review using PubMed to develop a database of cases of recurrent craniopharyngiomas previously treated with a transcranial approach.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in this review with a total of 75 cases. There were 50 males and 25 females with a mean age of 38 years (range 2-80). One prior transcranial surgery was done in 80.0% of cases, while 8.0% had two and 12.0% had more than two prior surgeries. Radiotherapy after transcranial resection was given in 18 cases (24.0%). Following EEA, vision improved in 60.0% of cases, and vision worsened in 8.6% of the cases. Of cases, 64.4% had pre-existing anterior hypopituitarism, and 43.8% had diabetes insipidus prior to EEA. New anterior hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus developed in 24.6% and 21.9% of cases, respectively following EEA. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 64.0%, subtotal resection in 32.0%, and partial resection in 4.0% revision EEA cases. GTR rate was higher in cases with no prior radiotherapy compared to cases with prior radiotherapy (72.0% vs 39.0%, p = 0.0372). The recurrence rate was 17.5% overall but was significantly lower at 10.0% following GTR (p = 0.0019). The average follow-up length was 41.2 months (range, 1-182 months).
CONCLUSION: The EEA can be utilized for resection of recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas previously managed by a transcranial approach.