Journal of gambling studies · 2017
The Involvement of a Concerned Significant Other in Gambling Disorder Treatment Outcome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiménez-Murcia Susana, Tremblay Joël, Stinchfield Randy, Granero Roser, Fernández-Aranda Fernando, Mestre-Bach Gemma, Steward Trevor, Del Pino-Gutiérrez Amparo, Baño Marta, Moragas Laura, Aymamí Neus, Gómez-Peña Mónica, Tárrega Salomé, Valenciano-Mendoza Eduardo, Giroux Isabelle, Sancho Marta, Sánchez Isabel, Mallorquí-Bagué Núria, González Vega, Martín-Romera Virginia, Menchón José M
Аннотация
Interpersonal distress is a common feature in gambling disorder and adding a concerned significant other (CSO) to the recovery process could be an effective tool for improving treatment outcome. However, little empirical evidence is available regarding the effectiveness of including a CSO to interventions. We aimed to compare treatment outcomes (i.e. compliance with therapy guidelines, dropout from treatment, and relapse during treatment) in a CBT program involving a CSO to CBT treatment as usual (TAU) without a CSO. The sample comprised male gambling disorder patients (N = 675). The manualized CBT intervention consisted of 16 weekly outpatient group sessions and a 3-month follow-up period. Patient CSOs attended a predetermined number of sessions with the patient and were provided with resources to acquire a better understanding of the disorder, to manage risk situations, and to aid patients in adhering to treatment guidelines. Patients with a CSO had significant higher treatment attendance and reduced dropout compared to patients receiving TAU. Moreover, patients whose spouse was involved in the treatment program were less likely to relapse and adhered to the treatment guidelines more than those with a non-spousal CSO. Our results suggest that incorporating interpersonal support to gambling disorder interventions could potentially improve treatment outcomes.