Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2026
The Acute Effects of a Cycling Warm-Up With and Without Foam Rolling on Biceps Femoris Stiffness and Tissue Homogeneity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Earp Jacob E, Joshi Lucas, Mathisen Connor, Robinson Davina, Rehbein Carlos O, Kraemer William J, Peñailillo Luis
Аннотация
Earp, JE, Joshi, L, Mathisen, C, Robinson, D, Rehbein, CO, Kraemer, WJ, and Peñailillo, L. The acute effects of a cycling warm-up with and without foam rolling on biceps femoris stiffness and tissue homogeneity. J Strength Cond Res 40(10): 1238-1244, 2026-Biceps femoris (BF LH ) strains are common athletic injuries that are influenced by the muscle's mechanical properties. Proximal-to-distal variation in muscle stiffness impairs load sharing and increases focal strain in the proximal region, where strain injuries are most likely to occur, and is believed to contribute to injury risk. Therefore, understanding the effects of specific warm-up activities on BF LH intramuscular stiffness and homogeneity is warranted. Twenty-one healthy active subjects performed a bilateral cycling warm-up followed by a unilateral foam rolling intervention (CYL + FR) or cycling alone (CYL). Changes in proximal-, middle-, and distal-BF LH passive intramuscular stiffness were assessed through shear wave elastography at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post-CYL and CYL + FR. Changes in overall and regional stiffness were compared between conditions using a 2 × 3 × 7 (Condition × Region × Time) mixed model ANOVA. Muscle stiffness decreased in both conditions (CYL: -1.349 ± 0.436 kP, CYL + FR: -1.095 ± 0.65 kP, p = 0.004) to a similar magnitude ( p = 0.707), and no condition by time effect was observed ( p = 0.480). However, proximal-BF LH stiffness decreased to a greater extent in CYL than CYL + FR (mean difference: -1.486 ± 0.629 kP, p = 0.028), but no differences were observed in the middle ( p = 0.548) or distal regions ( p = 0.216). Although foam rolling did not enhance or prolong changes in muscle stiffness, it did mitigate increases in stiffness heterogeneity that resulted from CYL in a pattern that would improve load sharing and reduce focal strain in the proximal-BF LH . Future work should examine whether promoting stiffness homogeneity through preactivity foam rolling translates to reduced hamstring strain incidence during subsequent activity.