DOI 10.1016/j.redar.2019.10.005
Anesthetic management of the diaphragmatic pacemaker placement surgery. Our experience in the Institut Guttmann.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The diaphragm pacemaker (DP) has proven its utility in replacing mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The DP improves patient quality of life and reduces morbidity and mortality and their associated health care costs. The anesthetic management of these patients and the particularities of the surgical procedure are challenging. The aim of our study is to analyze anesthetic management and intraoperative complications in patients undergoing DP placement in our hospital.
METHODS
We performed a chart review of patients treated between December 2007 and July 2017, recording the patients' preoperative status, anesthetic management and intraoperative complications.
RESULTS
The study included 16 patients (5 pediatric) undergoing DP implantation for chronic SCI (63%), ALS (25%) and other neurologic conditions (12%). Abdominal laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia, with intravenous (87%) or inhalational (13%) induction and maintenance using total intravenous (50%) or balanced (50%) anesthesia. Rocuronium was administered in one case to permit airway management. Complications included: hypotension (50%), difficulties in mechanical ventilation during laparoscopy (31%), pneumothorax (12.5%) and autonomic dysreflexia (6%).
CONCLUSIONS
DP placement under general anesthesia is a safe intervention in both adult and pediatric patients. Complications derived from both the underlying disease and the surgical technique may appear, and must be rapidly identified and treated to obtain a satisfactory surgical outcome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.