MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90132-4

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2000

Erythromycin in pityriasis rosea: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Sharma P K, Yadav T P, Gautam R K, Taneja N, Satyanarayana L

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The study stemmed from an incidental observation of improvement in 2 patients with pityriasis rosea while receiving erythromycin.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of erythromycin in patients with pityriasis rosea.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study was performed in an outpatient setting in a major hospital. Ninety patients over a period of 2 years were alternatively assigned to treatment group or placebo group. Patients in the treatment group received erythromycin in divided doses for 14 days. The response was categorized as complete response, partial response, or no response. All patients were followed up for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable with regard to age at presentation, sex, and average duration of disease at the time of reporting to the clinic. Upper respiratory tract infection before the appearance of skin lesions was reported in 68.8% of all patients. Complete response was observed in 33 patients (73.33%) in the treatment group and none in the placebo group (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

Oral erythromycin was effective in treating patients with pityriasis rosea.

Для цитирования: Sharma P K, Yadav T P, Gautam R K, Taneja N, Satyanarayana L. Erythromycin in pityriasis rosea: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90132-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.