m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026

Comparison of sesame oil wafers and lozenges as saliva substitutes for dry mouth in head and neck cancer patients: A crossover randomized control trial.

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Abbas Amanat Muhammad, Srichana Teerapol, Takahashi Yupanqui Chutha, Thearmontree Angkana

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Dry mouth is a condition associated with significant morbidity. It not only causes discomfort but also increases risk of many health and oral health problems.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy and patient satisfaction of a novel sesame oil wafer, called "Freeze-Dried Sesame Oil Emulsion Salivary Substitute (FD-SOESS)," with ACT® lozenges in managing dry mouth in patients who had undergone treatment for head and neck cancer.

METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, crossover trial was conducted in 35 patients. Subjective dry mouth (Shortening Xerostomia Inventory), objective dry mouth (Clinical Oral Dryness Score, CODS), dysphagia (Eating Assessment Tool-10, EAT-10) and oral mucositis (WHO Oral Toxicity Scale) were assessed before and after 2 weeks of use. Satisfaction was rated using a visual analog scale (VAS 0-10). Outcomes were compared using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests at a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS: Both products showed significant improvements in objective dry mouth. While the lozenges group showed a borderline significant improvement in subjective dry mouth (P=0.037). Notably, the FD-SOESS group demonstrated significant improvement in dysphagia scores (P=0.003). Satisfaction levels were moderate to high in both groups, with slightly higher levels in the FD-SOESS group.

CONCLUSION: To conclude, FD-SOESS significantly improved objective dry mouth and dysphagia but not subjective dry mouth. It received a relatively high level of satisfaction. Therefore, this newly developed product has the potential to be an alternative product for dry mouth patients.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты