World neurosurgery · 2019
Incidental Microaneurysms During Microvascular Surgery: Incidence, Treatment, and Significance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Sung Ho, Kwun Byung Duk, Ryu Jiwook, Chung Yeongu, Jeong Won Joo, Park Chang Kyu, Lee Kyung Mi, Kim Eui Jong, Choi Seok Keun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although new imaging tools have been developed for the detection of smaller aneurysms, angiographically negative microaneurysms are still encountered during cerebral microsurgery. Currently, only limited information regarding incidence and efficacy of treatment of these microaneurysms is available.
METHODS: We investigated the incidence and treatment of incidental microaneurysms (IMAs) in the last 5 years. IMAs are unidentifiable and invisible on preoperative angiography, but are detected during microvascular surgery. The inclusion criteria were aneurysm cases treated with microsurgery via transsylvian approaches, and those undergoing preoperative digital subtraction angiography.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 484 surgical cases (248 cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage and 236 cases of unruptured aneurysms) in 460 patients, and 33 tiny aneurysms were found in 31 operative cases (6.4% incidence per operation). The most typical type was located on another branching site of the middle cerebral artery found during neck clipping of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm. A patient with multiple aneurysms presented a statistically significant risk (375/78 vs. 15/16; P < 0.001) of IMA identification. IMAs were treated by clipping and wrapping in 18 and 15 cases, respectively, without complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a 6.4% incidence of IMAs; however, this could be underestimated because of the limited range of inspection. Early detection of an IMA through careful inspection during microvascular surgery could be beneficial, especially in patients with multiple aneurysms.
METHODS: We investigated the incidence and treatment of incidental microaneurysms (IMAs) in the last 5 years. IMAs are unidentifiable and invisible on preoperative angiography, but are detected during microvascular surgery. The inclusion criteria were aneurysm cases treated with microsurgery via transsylvian approaches, and those undergoing preoperative digital subtraction angiography.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 484 surgical cases (248 cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage and 236 cases of unruptured aneurysms) in 460 patients, and 33 tiny aneurysms were found in 31 operative cases (6.4% incidence per operation). The most typical type was located on another branching site of the middle cerebral artery found during neck clipping of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm. A patient with multiple aneurysms presented a statistically significant risk (375/78 vs. 15/16; P < 0.001) of IMA identification. IMAs were treated by clipping and wrapping in 18 and 15 cases, respectively, without complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a 6.4% incidence of IMAs; however, this could be underestimated because of the limited range of inspection. Early detection of an IMA through careful inspection during microvascular surgery could be beneficial, especially in patients with multiple aneurysms.